Nursing research paper introduction proposal

Jan 27, 2018 Nursing research paper introduction proposal, order quality essays -

Boarding Schools in Nursing research paper, the United States. Uf Admission Essay Building. On this page we cover boarding schools and outline the means for Nursing research introduction, applying to study in the US. For a complete guide to College essay don ts boarding, including information about admissions, please see our introductory guide. Chamberlain International School St. Stanislaus College Prep New Mexico Military Institute American Hebrew Academy Randolph-Macon Academy Southwestern Academy THINK Global School Heritage Hampshire Country School Army and Navy Academy St. Francis High School Buffalo Seminary Alpine Academy Foxcroft Academy Fork Union Military Academy The Gow School Leman Manhattan Preparatory School North Broward Preparatory School. Middleboro, Massachusetts 6 to 12 (Coed) Day school (25 students) Boarding school (98 students) Bay Saint Louis, Mississippi 7 to 12 (Boys) Day school (315 students) Boarding school (72 students) Roswell, New Mexico 9 to Nursing paper introduction 12 (Coed) Boarding school (843 students) Greensboro, North Carolina 9 to with 12 (Coed) Day school (20 students) Boarding school (120 students) Front Royal, Virginia 6 to 12 (Coed) Day school (56 students) Boarding school (269 students) San Marino, California 6 to 12 (Coed) Day school (34 students) Boarding school (110 students) New York, New York 10 to proposal 12 (Coed) Boarding school (46 students) Provo, Utah 7 to 12 (Boys) Boarding school (115 students) Rindge, New Hampshire 3 to 12 (Boys) Boarding school (22 students) Carlsbad, California 7 to questions 12 (Boys) Day school Boarding school. Hamburg, New York 9 to 12 (Boys) Day school (500 students) Boarding school (26 students) Buffalo, New York 9 to research paper introduction proposal 12 (Girls) Day school Boarding school.

Erda, Utah 7 to 12 (Girls) Boarding school (70 students) Dover-Foxcroft, Maine 9 to 12 (Coed) Day school (352 students) Boarding school (98 students) Fork Union, Virginia 7 to 12 (Boys) Day school (30 students) Boarding school (400 students) South Wales, New York 6 to 12 (Coed) Day school (15 students) Boarding school (135 students) New York, New York Preschool to College don ts 12 (Coed) Day school (635 students) Boarding school (115 students) Traditional International Baccalaureate. Research Paper Proposal. Coconut Creek, Florida Preschool to College essay services do and 12 (Coed) Day school (900 students) Boarding school (330 students) Liberal Arts International Baccalaureate. Our boarding school guide has advice specific to Nursing finding boarding schools. For insights that are more general (on how to evaluate school options) we recommend you review our hub on choosing a school. Private school expos are ideal launching pads for building, your school-finding journey. All expos are held in research paper introduction, the fall at essay building, a number of centres across Canada. There are three expos hosted in Ontario, one in Toronto, one in Halton-Peel, and one in Nursing paper introduction proposal, Ottawa. Expos are also held each fall in Vancouver, Montreal, and Calgary. All are opportunities to Challenges writing a paper justification speak with administrators from leading boarding schools within the regions in research introduction proposal, which the expos are held. Word-of-mouth is building, another powerful tool in your school-finding arsenal.

The Our Kids private school discussion forum allows you to introduction discuss your options and debate topics around gifted education. You can use our community of parents, educational experts, alumni, and schools to Dissertation service help answer your questions and Nursing stimulate your thinking. Challenges Justification. Attending open houses is obviously a great way to learn more about a school and get a feel for the environment. For some advice on open house visits, go here. Nursing Introduction. For questions to ask that are specific to essay do and don ts boarding programs, refer to our main boarding school hub. 205 Bidwell Parkway Buffalo New York 14222.

Day school (20 students) Boarding school (120 students) 4334 Hobbs Road Greensboro North Carolina 27410. Day school (20 students) Boarding school (120 students) 4334 Hobbs Road Greensboro North Carolina 27410. Nursing Research Paper Proposal. Broadly speaking, the cost of boarding reflects the cost private school tuition in Love questions, general, though with premiums added to cover housing and meals. Paper. Many schools offer financial aid, including scholarships and Uf admission essay bursaries. Financial aid is introduction proposal, needs-based, and financial aid programs are created as a means of broadening the student base and attracting students, independent of a paper justification, means, who will contribute most to the culture of the school. Generally speaking, the Nursing research introduction, larger and services more expensive schools provide the most aid. Nursing Proposal. You can read more about financial aid and Challenges when a paper scholarships in our dedicated guide. Research Paper. Below you#39;ll find the Dissertation delivery, range of costs at United States boarding schools: Day school (315 students) Boarding school (72 students) Day school (20 students) Boarding school (120 students) Day school (34 students) Boarding school (110 students) Boarding school (46 students) Day school (352 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (15 students) Boarding school (135 students) Day school (25 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (315 students) Boarding school (72 students) Boarding school (843 students) Day school (20 students) Boarding school (120 students) Day school (56 students) Boarding school (269 students) Day school (34 students) Boarding school (110 students) Boarding school (46 students) Boarding school (115 students)

$138,000 to Nursing paper introduction $138,000 style=color:#c00;Heritage. Boarding school (22 students) Day school (500 students) Boarding school (26 students) Boarding school (70 students) Day school (352 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (30 students) Boarding school (400 students) Day school (15 students) Boarding school (135 students) Day school (635 students) Boarding school (115 students) Day school (900 students) Boarding school (330 students) Day school (25 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (315 students) Boarding school (72 students) Boarding school (843 students) Day school (20 students) Boarding school (120 students) Day school (56 students) Boarding school (269 students) Day school (34 students) Boarding school (110 students) Boarding school (46 students) Boarding school (115 students) $138,000 to $138,000 style=color:#c00;Heritage. Uf Admission Essay Building. Boarding school (22 students) Day school (500 students) Boarding school (26 students) Boarding school (70 students) Day school (352 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (30 students) Boarding school (400 students) Day school (15 students) Boarding school (135 students) Day school (635 students) Boarding school (115 students) Day school (900 students) Boarding school (330 students) Auditory processing disorder. Language processing disorder. Research Paper Introduction Proposal. Non-verbal learning disorders. Visual motor deficit.

Oppositional defiant disorder. Day school (25 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (315 students) Boarding school (72 students) Boarding school (843 students) Day school (20 students) Boarding school (120 students) Day school (56 students) Boarding school (269 students) Day school (34 students) Boarding school (110 students) Boarding school (46 students) Boarding school (115 students) $138,000 to $138,000 style=color:#c00;Heritage. Boarding school (22 students) Day school (500 students) Boarding school (26 students) Boarding school (70 students) Day school (352 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (30 students) Boarding school (400 students) Day school (15 students) Boarding school (135 students) Day school (635 students) Boarding school (115 students) Day school (900 students) Boarding school (330 students) Day school (25 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (315 students) Boarding school (72 students) Boarding school (843 students) Day school (20 students) Boarding school (120 students) Day school (56 students) Boarding school (269 students) Day school (34 students) Boarding school (110 students) Boarding school (46 students) Boarding school (115 students) $138,000 to $138,000 style=color:#c00;Heritage. Boarding school (22 students) Day school (500 students) Boarding school (26 students) Boarding school (70 students)

Day school (352 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (30 students) Boarding school (400 students) Day school (15 students) Boarding school (135 students) Day school (635 students) Boarding school (115 students) Day school (900 students) Boarding school (330 students) Entry years and with phd proposal xavier university acceptance rates for Nursing proposal, day students. Day school (25 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (315 students) Boarding school (72 students) Day school (20 students) Boarding school (120 students) Day school (56 students) Boarding school (269 students) Day school (34 students) Boarding school (110 students) Day school (500 students) Boarding school (26 students) Day school (352 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (30 students) Boarding school (400 students) Day school (15 students) Boarding school (135 students) Day school (900 students) Boarding school (330 students) Entry years and acceptance rates for questions, boarding students. Day school (25 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (315 students) Boarding school (72 students) Boarding school (843 students) Day school (20 students) Boarding school (120 students) Day school (56 students) Boarding school (269 students) Day school (34 students) Boarding school (110 students) Boarding school (46 students) Boarding school (115 students) $138,000 to $138,000 style=color:#c00;Heritage. Boarding school (22 students) Day school (500 students) Boarding school (26 students) Boarding school (70 students) Day school (352 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (30 students) Boarding school (400 students) Day school (15 students) Boarding school (135 students) Day school (635 students) Boarding school (115 students) Day school (900 students) Boarding school (330 students) Day school (25 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (315 students) Boarding school (72 students) Boarding school (843 students) Day school (20 students) Boarding school (120 students)

Day school (56 students) Boarding school (269 students) Day school (34 students) Boarding school (110 students) Boarding school (46 students) Boarding school (115 students) $138,000 to proposal $138,000 style=color:#c00;Heritage. Boarding school (22 students) Day school (500 students) Boarding school (26 students) Boarding school (70 students) Day school (352 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (30 students) Boarding school (400 students) Day school (15 students) Boarding school (135 students) Day school (635 students) Boarding school (115 students) Day school (900 students) Boarding school (330 students) Day school (25 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (315 students) Boarding school (72 students) Day school (20 students) Boarding school (120 students) Day school (56 students) Boarding school (269 students) Day school (34 students) Boarding school (110 students) Boarding school (46 students) Boarding school (115 students) $138,000 to $138,000 style=color:#c00;Heritage. Boarding school (22 students) Day school (500 students) Boarding school (26 students) Boarding school (70 students) Day school (352 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (30 students) Boarding school (400 students) Day school (15 students) Boarding school (135 students) Day school (635 students) Boarding school (115 students) Day school (900 students) Boarding school (330 students)

Extracurricular sports (competitive) Day school (25 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (315 students) Boarding school (72 students) Day school (20 students) Boarding school (120 students) Day school (56 students) Boarding school (269 students) Day school (34 students) Boarding school (110 students) Boarding school (46 students) Boarding school (115 students) $138,000 to Biology paper writing service voucher $138,000 style=color:#c00;Heritage. Boarding school (22 students) Day school (500 students) Boarding school (26 students) Boarding school (70 students) Day school (352 students) Boarding school (98 students) Day school (30 students) Boarding school (400 students) Day school (15 students) Boarding school (135 students) Day school (635 students) Boarding school (115 students) Day school (900 students) Boarding school (330 students) The United States is introduction, home to some of the oldest and most respected boarding schools on Biology writing service voucher, the continent, as well as some of the most progressive schools in Nursing paper introduction, the world. Help Xavier. All participate in a robust, world-class academic tradition that, in many ways, is second to research paper proposal none. The US is also home to Help with xavier a greater variety of quality boarding options than you#39;ll find in any other part of the world. Included are preeminent schools in Nursing paper proposal, the arts, athletics, and Love essay questions military training, as well as schools renowned as pioneers in academic development and special needs. When it comes to boarding options, if you can#39;t find it here, it#39;s very likely that you can#39;t find it anywhere.

Graduation requirements, as well as the degrees offered, can vary between schools based on Nursing paper introduction, focus, curriculum, and affiliation. Often, international students who board in the US will work toward the fulfillment of an International Baccalaureate Diploma. The International Baccalaureate Diploma Program. The International Baccalaureate is a two-year advanced secondary school curriculum that was founded in 1968 and is now taught in schools in Uf admission, more than 140 countries, including many alternative institutions in Canada. Research Paper Introduction Proposal. The IB curriculum was created for students aged 16 to Challenges when a paper 19. It is intended to provide a well-rounded, high quality, advanced course of Nursing paper introduction proposal, study that delivers the Uf admission building, basics of high school education while challenging students to paper introduction apply their knowledge and Dissertation skills through collaboration, discussion, and communication. Nursing Paper Introduction Proposal. In order to earn an IB diploma students complete a course of study in Biology voucher, six core subject areas (language and literature, language acquisition, individuals and societies, sciences, mathematics, and research introduction the arts) an essay of up to 4000 words, and sit standard, externally assessed exams. In addition to course work, students are also required to essay building complete two formal projects and a minimum of 50 hours of community service. Research Introduction Proposal. University recognition of the College essay services don ts, IBDP. Each of Canada#39;s universities is research introduction, free to sets its own admissions standards and to essay do and don ts assess each candidate based on Nursing research paper introduction, their own internal criteria.

There is essay, no national university entrance exam or governing body overseeing university admissions. As a result, admission criteria can vary widely, even between universities within Canada. Students are required to paper contact colleges or universities directly to find a list of admission requirements and Uf admission building deadlines, and to paper introduction proposal submit transcripts in essay questions, support of their application. While the research introduction proposal, specific details of recognition can vary between universitiesor, in College essay services do and don ts, some cases, even between faculty within a universitythe IB diploma is Nursing research introduction, widely accepted as an Uf admission essay, admission credential if scores earned meet certain targets. Research Introduction Proposal. In some instances, IB courses and College services do and exams are recognized for transfer credit within an institution, used in fulfillment of university degree requirements and/or fulfilling course prerequisite requirements. NOTE: This is Nursing research paper introduction proposal, not a legal document, and is intended only to provide a very general overview of the Challenges a paper, process required of Canadians when applying to study in the United States.

For up-to-date information, please refer to Nursing proposal the US Department of Homeland Security “Study in review service, the States” guidelines. Canadians attending high school in research paper introduction, the US, including boarding schools, need to enter the Uf admission essay building, country with an Nursing paper proposal, F-1 student visa. Services. The visa can be obtained by Nursing introduction, following these steps: apply to and be accepted by Love essay, a school that has been approved by the Student and research introduction Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP). (If you would like to Dissertation review check if the school you are applying to Nursing paper introduction is SEVP approved, click here.) complete the Form I-20, Certificate of Eligibility for Uf admission building, Nonimmigrant Status. Nursing Research Proposal. The school will give you this form along with your acceptance notification. Paper Voucher. If you are applying to Nursing research paper introduction proposal more than one school, each school will send a separate I-20 form. Use only the form for the school you will be attending. The I-20 is proof that you have been registered with the Dissertation service delivery, Student and research paper proposal Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS).

Check your I-20 form against do and your passport to confirm that your name is spelled correctly, and introduction proposal that it shows your correct date of birth. If not, contact the school and ask that they send you a corrected I-20. Pay the I-901 SEVIS fee and keep a copy of the receipt. You can pay it online. Print out essay building, a copy of the receipt as you’ll need to be able to show that the fee has been paid when you appear for research, your visa interview. Complete form DS 160, the online nonimmigrant visa application. Make an appointment for with university, a visa interview at Nursing research, a US embassy or consulate. Help With Phd Proposal University. To find the nearest office to Nursing research paper proposal you, click here. At the interview you’ll be asked to review service delivery demonstrate that you: have been accepted by a school in the US are able to pay the Nursing research paper introduction proposal, tuition and travel costs, are prepared for building, the program you’ve been accepted to don’t intend to research paper introduction proposal remain permanently in the US Be sure to services take the following with you when you attend your visa pplication interview: Form I20 I901 SEVIS fee payment receipt printout of paper proposal, your DS-160 confirmation page visa application fee payment receipt passport valid for at least 6 months after you plan to enter the US a Two-inch by two-inch photo of paper service voucher, yourself Receive your F-1 visa and get ready to go! You can enter the US up to research paper introduction 30 days before the first day of essay building, school.

When you enter you’ll be asked to show all your documentation, at which point you’ll be given a Form I-94, your arrival/departure record. The Essential Parent Guide to Private Education. e-Newsletter to paper introduction get news straight to your inbox. Sign up to Uf admission essay building receive our exclusive eNews twice a month. You can withdraw consent by unsubscribing anytime.

From Our Kids, Canada’s trusted source for private schools, camps, and extracurriculars.

Jan 27, 2018 Nursing research paper introduction proposal, academic proofreading -

Proposition 8: The Same-Sex Marriage Debate. Recently, I posted a number of posts about California Proposition 8. This is an emotionally charged issue with good thoughts on both sides. Not surprisingly, my posts sparked debate in the comment sections where a number of excellent questions were raised. Richard Hollis is one commentator who raised especially thoughtful questions. Nursing Introduction? As a result of the questions raised, especially by Richard, I have decided to do and don ts, write my thoughts on Same-Sex Marriage from the introduction ground up and have asked Richard to Challenges when writing justification, respond. Below is paper introduction my essay followed by Richard’s response. Please note, when I sent Richard my essay, I had not yet added links to do and don ts, my sources. Richard and research paper introduction proposal readers of Evangelical Outpost – thank you for your thoughtful read and with phd proposal xavier consideration of this post. – Dustin Steeve. The upcoming proposition amending the constitution in research introduction proposal, the state of California to affirm marriage gives us opportunity to pause and reflect. Since 1970, marriage has endured a series of essay, devastating attacks. Paper? In January 1970 the Family Law Act was signed by California Governor Ronald Reagan and “no-fault divorce” was written into law.

Reagan would later cite this as one of his greatest regrets. The intent of the law was to Help with phd proposal xavier university, help Californians separate amicably without having to contrive reasons for obtaining a divorce. As the explosive increase in divorces since 1970 attests, the effect of the law was that it hurt marriage. Presently, proposition 8 is giving Californians a rare opportunity to stop further tampering of introduction proposal, marriage through law. As we consider the questions proposition, reason, empirical evidence, and research paper proposal morality ought to inform us. Essay Building? Each of these has led me to the decision to affirm marriage by Nursing research paper introduction proposal voting yes on proposition 8. Marriage is Uf admission essay a fundamental building block of society. That phrase is often used but seldom explained.

When I say “fundamental building block of Nursing paper proposal, society” I am referring to marriage’s natural creation of paper service, families. Families build societies through the Nursing research natural birthing and questions rearing of Nursing research proposal, children. Without children, societies cease to exist. Reason dictates that a society wishing to preserve itself ought to foster and protect the union whereby children are naturally born, supported, and socialized. For marriages where child birth is not possible, married couples have the option to adopt children who do not have the protection and Challenges writing justification support of their biological parents. Current laws support this natural and healthy system. Allowing same-sex couples to become a normal part of this system is unhealthy and unwise for the following reasons. According to A. Dean Byrd, Ph.D, “There is Nursing research introduction no fact that has been established by Challenges when justification social science literature more convincingly than the following: all variables considered, children are best served when reared in introduction proposal, a home with a married mother and father.” Psychological evidence shows that children have needs which are met uniquely by parents of opposite gender. From the way mothers and fathers uniquely hold children, to the way they uniquely play with children or discipline children, a child’s need for love, support, and personal well-being are met uniquely by parents of the opposite gender. By definition, same-sex couples cannot meet these unique needs.

Furthermore, no reputable psychological theory or empirical study denies the importance of mothers in a child’s development. Gay men raising children are doing so without a mother in the nuclear family. Building? Given the evidence, it is false to believe that science shows all family forms to be equal. Out of love for our children and for introduction our fellow citizen, we ought not to solidify this false belief by writing into law and teaching it to Challenges writing, our children. If we chose to ignore the number of needs a same-sex couple by definition cannot provide to the state or to the life of children, the research paper introduction same-sex culture still has elements of great concern which we ought to consider before we introduce these elements into marriage. Questions? Pain and paper introduction suffering resulting from sexual disease permeate homosexual communities. According to review service delivery, ex-gay speaker Mike Haley, the odds of paper introduction, a straight man contracting AIDS after one heterosexual encounter are 1 in 165,000 as opposed to 1 in phd proposal xavier university, 175 for paper introduction proposal gay men after one homosexual encounter.

These tragic statistics on HIV/AIDS seem to be confirmed by the Center for Love essay Disease Control estimates on HIV prevalence. Multiple differences in Nursing research, lifestyles account for this including the Biology paper voucher greater likelihood of drug use among gay men as well as a higher average sexual partner rate. Domestic abuse occurs much more frequently within the homosexual community more than within heterosexual relationships. Nursing Research Paper Introduction? 78% of lesbians have reported domestic abuse related problems. Gay and bisexual men experience violence at a rate of 2 to 5. In addition to the problems of disease and violence, the homosexual community has a concept of essay do and don ts, “commitment” that is very different from marital commitment. Currently, monogamy is the norm and is socially expected among married couples. Only 25% of heterosexual men and 15% of research introduction, heterosexual women report sexual infidelity; 17% of marriages end in divorce as a result of infidelity. However, within the homosexual community, infidelity is the norm. Recent studies show that 95.6% of gay men report infidelity in their current relationship.

Numerous studies reveal that, among self-described committed homosexual couples, each individual has had an average of essay questions, 3-5 partners a year. Apparently, marriage can get worse. I have given reasons why I believe equating homosexual unions with marriage is unhealthy. Upon these grounds, I believe a rational decision can be made. Research Paper Introduction? However, before I go further in the argument, I want to be clear on Help with phd proposal university the following point: anyone who suggests you keep your morality out of the Nursing paper introduction proposal marriage question is university making a dangerous proposition. Laws are filled with moral presuppositions and prescriptions. Though law and morality are not the same, laws are written by people and Nursing research introduction every person follows a moral compass. At its core, the decision to affirm marriage is a moral matter. The decision to essay questions, allow homosexuals to marry is a moral matter because at the core of Nursing introduction proposal, homosexual marriage is homosexuality. Your answer to the question of whether homosexuality is moral is going to determine your view of whether homosexual marriage should be accepted.

My moral framework is heavily informed by with phd proposal xavier my evangelical Christian faith. I believe the Nursing introduction proposal Lord clearly speaks against homosexuality through scripture. Questions? I recognize that the claim is controversial and worthy of its own post, but for the sake of brevity, I cite I Corinthians 6: 9-11 as evidence. I believe an appropriate Christian response to Nursing research paper introduction proposal, homosexuality is one which recognizes that the opposite do and of homosexuality is not heterosexuality, its holiness. Christians ought to respond to homosexuality as they ought to respond to all other sins: pursuing holiness and lovingly calling others to Nursing research introduction proposal, pursue holiness likewise.

One need not be a Christian in order to have a compelling moral argument against homosexuality. For example, you might be Aristotelian. If so, you might consider the anatomical design of men and women and Challenges when writing a paper conclude that homosexual sex is against the proper function of humans. Research Paper Introduction? Perhaps you believe that there exists a proper order of review service delivery, things as a brute fact of the universe. Certainly, most people believe that there is some kind of order to the universe. If you hold the introduction proposal universe to be ordered, then you might look at the numerous physiological complications resulting from gay sex, such as the need for colostomies, and conclude that the activity is disordered and therefore not good. These are just a few of the building many moral frameworks from which arguments against Nursing paper, homosexuality can be levied.

Western tradition has always understood marriage and heterosexuality to be normal, healthy, and Biology writing service moral. Advocates for homosexual marriage claim that homosexual marriage is equally normal, healthy, and Nursing research proposal moral. Just as in formal debate the essay don ts burden of proof rests on those presenting challenge to the status quo, so the burden of Nursing research, proof rests on the advocates of homosexual marriage to prove its morality. Marriage is a fundamental building block of our society. It is foolish to believe altering the form of the marital union will not have consequences. For the reasons stated above, if we allow homosexual marriage, I believe its consequences will be adverse to marriage.

Recently, marriage has suffered the consequences of unhealthy ideas written into law such as no-fault divorce. Now we can put a stop to that trend. I hope that you will apply reason to an examination of the evidence, that you will allow your moral framework to play a role in your decision. Uf Admission Essay? I believe that I have done so and have come to the conclusion that it is my responsibility, morally and for reasons pertaining to the health of my society, to vote yes on proposition 8 and affirm marriage. by Dustin Steeve. Your essay begins by introduction proposal talking about the ‘devastating attacks’ that have been waged against essay don ts, marriage since 1970, citing no-fault divorce as an example. The impression it seems to convey is that marriage is a sacred institution that has stood immovable and implacable for Nursing research paper introduction proposal eons, but now recently faces threat. This is Dissertation review something of a fallacy. The Bible itself (a popular reference point for those who traditionally oppose same-sex marriage) shows us that different attitudes to Nursing research proposal, marriage have been in vogue in different times.

The Israelite patriarch Jacob, for example, married both Rachel and Uf admission essay building Leah, daughters of Laban. “And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week: and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also.” –Genesis 29:28. Jacob ended up with four wives, and was far from the only polygamist in Nursing paper introduction proposal, the Bible. Uf Admission Essay Building? Others include Gideon (Judges 8:30), Elkanah, father of the prophet Samuel (1 Samuel 1:2), and kings such as Abijah (2 Chronicles 13:21), Rehoboam (2 Chronicles 11:21), and Jehoiada (2 Chronicles 24:3). Most famously, Solomon himself had “seven hundred wives… and three hundred concubines” (2 Kings 11:3). None of these royal polygamists were chastised or punished by God for this – except for introduction proposal Solomon, but even here the building exception proves the rule. According to the Bible, Solomon’s sin was not that he married many wives, but that he married foreign wives who turned him away from Nursing research paper, worshipping Yahweh (11:4). Of course, these were times when women were considered merely property, and the New Testament moves much closer to our traditional ‘one-man-one-woman’ view of marriage (though it never actually condemns the Biology polygamists of the Old Testament). But it does show that the concept of marriage has changed, and research introduction proposal is culturally specific, rather than an institution with clear rules handed down by God and Help xavier thriving unchanged throughout human history since Creation.

For an example closer to Nursing introduction proposal, our time, consider interracial marriage. In 1967, Mildred Loving and Help phd proposal her husband Richard, an interracial couple, were arrested at Nursing research, their Virginia home for violating that state’s anti-miscegenation law. The couple pleaded guilty, and were sentenced to a year in prison. The appeal went all the Challenges when a paper justification way up to research, the Supreme Court, which lead to an end to Love, bans on interracial marriage. Today the fight to end the ban on research proposal same-sex marriage mirrors the one to end the ban on interracial marriage. Gay couples, just like mixed race couples, seek exactly the same thing: to be allowed to marry the ones they love. It is a parallel which many supporters of the ban find uncomfortable, since racism these days is so widely regarded as bigoted and College don ts unacceptable. Homophobia, unfortunately, is less so. Next, you claim that children “have needs which are met uniquely by parents of opposite gender.” I am sorry that, being a draft essay, there is no link for introduction me to follow, but let me cite the Biology following for examples of many, many studies which show insignificant or no detrimental affects on children having been raised by same-sex couples. If the sources you cite turn out to research paper introduction proposal, be valid, we can only conclude that the results from essay questions, research and studies are, at best, mixed.

It is introduction also worth considering the sort of Challenges justification, people that society does allow to marry and procreate. Murders, convicted felons, even child molesters are still free to wed and have children. Research Paper? They do not lose these rights through their actions. In the Love questions eyes of the law, they are still considered capable of paper introduction proposal, loving another person and their own children, while homosexuals are not. This should be obviously ridiculous to anyone who has ever met a single homosexual. When Writing? They are just as capable of loving another person, and a child, as heterosexuals.

But that is rather beside the point, because when discussing whether a same-sex marriage is a healthy environment in which to Nursing research paper introduction proposal, raise a child, you are really talking about gay adoption and parenting. This is an entirely new argument (though one in which I’d be happy to participate). Even if it were shown that a same-sex household was not a suitable environment in which to raise a child (and I am not agreeing with that statement at essay do and, all), then that would still not be have any relevance on whether we should allow gay people the introduction right to be joined in Help xavier university, matrimony to their partner. Unlike the Nursing research paper introduction proposal case of interracial marriage where children are generally an Uf admission, inevitable consequence of marriage, for Nursing research introduction proposal same-sex couples they obviously are not. You then go on to quote shocking statistics about homosexual relationships.

I have to be honest, but when I read them I laughed. This is exactly the kind of Uf admission building, homophobic nonsense which simply does not stand up to real-world experience of homosexuals. Paper Proposal? “78% of lesbian relationships are riddled with domestic abuse… Only 25% of with university, heterosexual men and 15% of paper proposal, heterosexual women report sexual infidelity… 95.6% of gay men report infidelity in review delivery, their current relationship.” Again, I only wish I had the paper links available to me to read up on these studies, but as it is Help xavier I simply do not believe they are accurate or reliable. The implications are clear: homosexuals are dirty and diseased, totally unable to control their lusts and their relationships are all dysfunctional. In actual fact, you only need to Nursing introduction, spend a little time on when a paper justification the gay scene to realise that homosexuals are people, just like heterosexuals. Relationships are just as complicated and complex as they are for heterosexuals. Perhaps homosexuals are a little more inclined to promiscuity (though I find the statistics you quote grossly exaggerated), but -and this is the point- you still find love between homosexuals. Plutonic love, fraternal love, but also deep, caring, romantic love. And the fact is that these couples cannot marry. Same-sex marriage has been legal in Nursing research introduction, several countries for years, so we can, to a limited degree, measure the effects of same-sex marriage. Essay Building? Denmark, for example, legalised it in 1989. The results from this ‘long-running experiment’ have been uniformly positive.

Opposition to the Danish law was led by Nursing paper the clergy (much the same as in the States). A survey conducted at the time revealed that 72 percent of Danish clergy were opposed to the law. With? It was passed anyway, and the change in the attitude of the clergy there has been dramatic – a survey conducted in Nursing research paper introduction proposal, 1995 indicated that 89 percent of the Danish clergy now admit that the law is a good one and has had many beneficial effects, including a reduction in suicide, a reduction in the spread of sexually transmitted diseases and in promiscuity and paper writing service infidelity among gays. But again, this rather misses the research proposal point. If you are worried that same-sex couples seem promiscuous, then your real quarrel is with promiscuity, not same-sex couples. If you believe that same-sex couples are violent, then your real quarrel is with violence, not same-sex couples. If you believe that sexually transmitted diseases are more common among same-sex couples, then your problem is service with sexually transmitted diseases, not same-sex couples. To refuse marriage to research paper introduction proposal, all same-sex couples on these grounds is simply to be a bigot and tar all homosexuals with the building same brush. You then go on to talk about laws being rooted in morality. This I do agree with. Laws are entirely human constructs, and we make and revise them as we see fit.

We do look to research proposal, our own moral compasses to guide us in Uf admission building, deciding what activities should be criminalised in Nursing paper introduction, our societies, and which should not. However, you then state that your own morality is rooted in your religion, and essay building that you object to homosexuality itself for religious reasons. This, of course, is your choice. You may base your beliefs on whatever you wish, and research introduction I don’t doubt that religion is a popular choice for many people. But when your religious beliefs lead you to actively support a ban which has deep and fundamental consequences on other people, you are effectively enforcing your own religious beliefs onto other people.

You correctly state that one does not need to be a Christian to Help phd proposal xavier, oppose gay marriage, but that does not mean that everyone does, by a long, long way. Research Paper Introduction? Many homosexuals may belong to Biology writing service voucher, any number of religions who are neutral to the matter or homosexuality. Many sects of Buddhism, for example, celebrate homosexual relationships. In reality it is their religious freedom which is being infringed. Nursing Paper Introduction? The state should not be trying to enforce a religion on its citizens, which is essentially what is happening if same-sex couples are forbidden to marry for religious reasons. Anyone who believes in genuine religious freedom cannot oppose same-sex marriage on the basis of their own personal religious beliefs. “Just as in formal debate the Dissertation delivery burden of proof rests on those presenting challenge to Nursing research proposal, the status quo, so the essay burden of proof rests on the advocates of homosexual marriage to prove its morality.” This, I am afraid is simply not true. The burden of proof is not on research introduction anyone challenging the status quo. Such beliefs helped to keep slavery and racial segregation alive for years. To quote from Wikipedia: “Under the Latin maxim necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, the ordinary rule is that “the necessity of proof lies with he who complains.” For example, a person has to prove that someone is guilty (in a criminal case) or liable (in a civil case) depending on essay building the allegations; a person is not required to prove his or her own innocence, it is rebuttably presumed.” In the case of homosexuality, the burden is on ‘they who complain’, i.e., the people who object to it.

Just as we should assume arrested men are innocent until shown guilty. We should also assume homosexuality is morally ‘innocent’ until shown otherwise. The problem with your position is that you start with a prejudice (that homosexuality is wrong), and then challenge people to convince you otherwise. Nursing Research Paper Proposal? This is back to Biology paper writing service, front. Can you see the paper introduction problem if I stated that I think all black people are immoral and then challenged people to prove me wrong (just to be clear, I don’t actually think that)? To conclude, allowing same-sex couples to essay, marry will not bring about the Nursing paper proposal destruction of marriage, families and society in general. All homosexuals are asking for is the right to be united with their loved ones, and to have that union recognised for what it is: in every aspect, just as moral, loving, legitimate and worthy of respect as those undertaken by heterosexuals. By what right do we deny them this? By Richard Hollis. Dustin Steeve is a blogger and web enthusiast.

Dustin's passion is to see his generation of Christians rise up as thought leaders, doing remarkable, good work Christianly. Dustin is interested in the rise of web media and increasingly prominent use of Dissertation review delivery, computer technology as a tool to aid people. Dustin worked for three years as the director of proposal, GodblogCon and is an adviser for the Christian Web Conference. Essay? Dustin graduated summa cum laude and research received his B.A. in services do and don ts, History from Biola University where he also graduated from Torrey Honors Institute. Dustin has completed some post-graduate work at the Stanford Graduate School of Business where he was appointed to the Dean's List and Nursing research paper proposal received a certificate of completion from the Summer Institute for General Management. View all posts by Help with Dustin R. Research Paper Proposal? Steeve.

You state that “at the core of homosexual marriage is homosexuality…[and] whether homosexuality is moral” If this is review really the core issue, then why all the subterfuge over marriage? Why not criminalize homosexuality? For if you cannot justify criminalizing homosexuality, its seems to me that you cannot make a good argument against banning gay marriage. If you respond that you do want to introduction, criminalize homosexuality too (I mean literally fine, jail, or deport gay people), then it seems somewhat deceitful that you haven’t explicitly made that policy argument. It prompts questions about a “secret agenda” or “slippery slope”….will you next criminalize divorce next, taking the Lord’s name in vane, dancing, or alcohol? We are all sinners. After the “pure Christians” finish with the do and gays, will they come for me next? Recent studies show that 95.6% of Nursing proposal, gay men report infidelity in their current relationship. Uf Admission Essay Building? Numerous studies reveal that, among self-described committed homosexual couples, each individual has had an average of 3-5 partners a year.

If you are morally opposed to Nursing research paper introduction, the idea of gay people being promiscuous, why do you not support proposals to give them a legal incentive toward monogamy? “. College Essay? . . the opposite of homosexuality is not heterosexuality, its holiness.” So what’s the opposite of heterosexuality? And again, if “the core of homosexual marriage is homosexuality,” what is at Nursing research introduction, “the core” of heterosexual marriage? If you are morally opposed to the idea of Love essay, gay people being promiscuous, why do you not support proposals to give them a legal incentive toward monogamy? Are saying gays need to be bribed to be monogamous? Loving each other and being in a committed relationship isn’t enough? You’ve got to get goodies from the state? Sounds like gays have a lot of problems to work out before they start demanding marriage.

First, I think that fully legal and supported Civil Unions should be the level of acceptance supported by the legal system — I read (and lightly believe) that there are some 27 different legal rights of a spouse from marriage that, in theory, could be gained by specific contractual agreements. I’d actually like to see a full booklet summarizing all of them, but haven’t (perhaps you know?). Marriage is for children. In a very real, genetic based way, every child is a marriage of half of each parent’s DNA — the Nursing paper introduction proposal mother’s ovum DNA is married to essay services do and, the father’s sperm DNA. (a bond no one can sunder.) How many gov’t benefits / lower taxes or credits, etc., should be granted to parents is Nursing paper proposal one of the particular issues somewhat outside of ‘gay marriage’. I think the phd proposal xavier university non-gov’t benefits of Nursing paper introduction proposal, marriage are so great that no additional benefits are needed, until very expensive children are born — and it is in the raising of children that gov’t cash benefits should be focused. All homosexuals are asking for services is the research paper introduction proposal right to be united with their loved ones, and to have that union recognised for what it is: in every aspect, just as moral, loving, legitimate and worthy of respect as those undertaken by services do and don ts heterosexuals. By what right do we deny them this? Because promiscuity is immoral, and there’s a much higher probability of promiscuity among gays than among married straights, I don’t consider them ‘equal’. Drunk driving is a better comparison than inter-racial marriage.

Most drunk drivers most of the time get home as safely as sober drivers — and many sober folk have accidents. Yet drunk driving is illegal because of the probability of more accidents. I don’t consider any unmarried lovers as ‘respect worthy’ as married lovers, because of the commitment to fidelity promise; gays asking for marriage are not even uniform in agreement on whether fidelity should be part of their marriage agreement. Marriage has already been weakened, and Nursing research proposal devalued (a la Britney, Liz Taylor, etc.); and even love itself has been primarily portrayed in culture as lust, rather than commitment. Gay marriage rather than civil unions weakens it further. Finally, homosexual behavior is sinful in Christian theology. Part of the gay marriage push to Love questions, ‘equal morality’ is to make it illegal to claim that gay sex is sinful. Nursing Research Paper Introduction Proposal? (See Europe) I’m a sinner, too. But even so, I object to steps towards restricting Christians from calling gay sex sinful — and thus immoral. Straight promiscuity is also immoral; and Biology service neither should be respected as equal to married faithfulness.

Marriage is a fundamental building block of society. Nursing? That phrase is Biology paper writing often used but seldom explained. When I say “fundamental building block of society” I am referring to marriage’s natural creation of Nursing introduction, families. Agreed but I think you would then also agree that it is all the more important not to Uf admission building, exclude members of society from marriage unless there is a very good reason. In addition, you miss the trees from the forest.

A family is not just a baby or child but many people. Marriage, when it works well, provides for research proposal stability for all family members. This is good for a baby but it is College services do and also good for everyone else, such as the elderly or even the single person who is Nursing proposal alone. According to A. Dean Byrd, Ph.D, “There is no fact that has been established by social science literature more convincingly than the following: all variables considered, children are best served when reared in a home with a married mother and father.” OK but what does this have to do with gay marriage? By definition the only way for a gay couple to be raising a kid is if this above ideal has broken down somehow. According to ex-gay speaker Mike Haley, the odds of when writing a paper, a straight man contracting AIDS after one heterosexual encounter are 1 in 165,000 as opposed to 1 in 175 for gay men after one homosexual encounter. That’s a good point in favor for gay marriage, as for the other statistics:

I have given reasons why I believe equating homosexual unions with marriage is unhealthy. Upon these grounds, I believe a rational decision can be made. Not really, you’ve written off a class of human beigns based on a sociological study. Give me an paper introduction proposal, Excel sheet with enough data and I’ll find you plenty of niches among heterosexuals that replicate the ‘problems’ you’ve shown. Paper Writing? For example, if I demonstrated that marriages of 35+ yr old women to Nursing, men between 19-24 have incidents of cheating and STDs equal or greater than the ones you cited for gays would you prohibit the recognition of such marriages? How many other members of your cohort would it take to Uf admission essay, screw up marriage so much that you’d give up your wife?

People who cite studies are of more dubious moral character than any homosexual my friend, don’t be a sociologist! Tread very carefully! The decision to allow homosexuals to marry is a moral matter because at the core of homosexual marriage is homosexuality. Your answer to Nursing paper, the question of Challenges a paper justification, whether homosexuality is moral is going to Nursing paper proposal, determine your view of whether homosexual marriage should be accepted. My moral framework is heavily informed by my evangelical Christian faith. 1. Not all people are Christians and not even all Christians agree with you on writing a paper gay marriage. 2. Nursing Research Paper? The purpose of the state is writing a paper not to Nursing introduction proposal, enshrine Christian morality and Help with xavier university it isn’t to ‘teach’ morality. This is why many marriages are perfectly legal even though they would ideally be given at least a little skeptical scrutiny by research paper introduction a pastor….more about that below… Recently, marriage has suffered the consequences of unhealthy ideas written into law such as no-fault divorce. Now we can put a stop to that trend. Why don’t you show us how keeping the gay couple down the street from being able to have a legal marriage stops you from Dissertation, being a good father to your children or a good husband to your wife…or at paper introduction, least would facilitate you becoming a better one?

If you can’t do that then why not ‘put a stop to that trend’ by, say, actually putting a stop to the trend and put your eggs in rewriting divorce laws. Paper Service Voucher? A cynic might say here you are rallying the troops behind feeling good by attacking a minority group you people do not like, do not associate with and would like to scapegoat for Nursing research paper proposal your own miserable failings. As a matter of fact, why not go only Uf admission essay building as far as the Catholic Church and Nursing research proposal refuse to recognize divorced people who have remarried except under circumstances where an application for annullment has been vetted and granted? Why not castigate the failure of your VP candidate to properly raise her daughter and stop celebrating the impending marriage that…study wise….is likely to be yet another failed marriage? Timber in thine own eye indeed. Are saying gays need to be bribed to Love, be monogamous? Loving each other and being in a committed relationship isn’t enough? Please stop trying to paper proposal, outstupid smmtheory, on the previous SSM thread he takes the essay services do and campionship. On the off chance you’re serious I wouldn’t say marriage is a ‘bribe’ to be monogamous but more of a challenge that has both positive and paper introduction proposal negative reinforcement. Even with no-fault divorce and adultry no longer being a major cause for when a paper ‘punishment’ in divorce hearings you’re playing with fire if you get married without an intention to at least try to be monogamous. Your partner can screw you over (pardon the pun) in lots of ways both legal and paper proposal emotional. (For an interesting take on how marriage has a dark side that can, in Challenges writing, some ways, be good see the response this advice columnist gave here:http://www.salon.com/mwt/col/tenn/2008/08/22/laughter_in_the_dark/ really read it, it was one of the most interesting takes I’ve ever read although it’s not directly tied to Nursing research paper introduction, gay marriage at all)

Loving each other and being in a committed relationship isn’t enough? NOTE: All the moms and service voucher dads with teen kids thinking of research introduction proposal, moving in with their girlfriends or boyfriends might want to take note of this phrase from ucfengr. Uf Admission? Take the internet filter off the p orn #038; block out ucfengr’s writing least you want some of his words thrown at research paper introduction proposal, you! Please stop trying to paper service voucher, outstupid smmtheory, on the previous SSM thread he takes the campionship. Perhaps you should get over yourself, Boonton. You’re really not smart enough to call other people stupid so freely. On the off chance you’re serious I wouldn’t say marriage is Nursing research proposal a ‘bribe. That’s great, but you weren’t the one I was responding to. I was responding to this: why do you not support proposals to give them a legal incentive toward monogamy? Most people don’t need a “legal incentive” to stay monogamous, even before they are married. For most the knowledge that infidelity would severely damage or destroy a relationship is enough, but apparently that is not enough for gays, who need a government bribe.

Richard Hollis wrote: Again, I only xavier university wish I had the links available to me to read up on these studies, but as it is I simply do not believe they are accurate or reliable. I’m not sure I understand this objection, since there were ample links to the statistic sources and the studies to which Dustin referred. Perhaps you object to the fact that some of these sources are not downloadable for free? Or is it that they are hosted on paper introduction proposal sites like Family Research Council (www.frc.org) to which you do not wish to contribute?

Or (as I believe is more likely) do you simply choose to disbelieve those studies that do not fit your world view? Don’t misunderstand me: I frankly think Prop 8 is the wrong solution to the “problem”, if “gay marriage” is Challenges a paper justification a problem. I would rather that government, at introduction, all levels, have nothing to say at Uf admission essay, all about paper proposal, marriage. That which government controls will likely be controlled in Challenges, a manner I do not approve. Marriage is a great example of Nursing paper proposal, this principle. I believe it to be a sacred covenant, which should be sanctioned by Love essay questions the church and society, and entered (or dissolved) by Nursing research paper proposal the free choice of individuals. As such, the coercive power of government at any level is Biology paper writing voucher not only unnecessary, it distorts the societal benefit and religious meaning of the relationship. Government’s role, if it has any at all, should be limited to enforcing the terms of the contract. Would such a laissez-faire approach allow same-sex couples to Nursing, get “married”?

Of course. Would such couples get the benefits accorded to “traditional” marriages? No more or less than they do now; such benefits are under the control of the institution doing the providing, whether a charity, employer, or government. As an example, anti-Prop 8 groups cite the problem that a same-sex partner would not inherit pensions. The truth is, pensions are not inheritable, unless it is stipulated in the contract(s) that create the pension . And, in Dissertation service delivery, fact, many — not all, but many — pension plans are inheritable by anyone the pension recipien;t wishes, whether spouse, partner, progeny, or next-door neighbor. That some, and maybe most pensions are not so designable is not a problem with the paper introduction law, it is a problem with the contract signed to create the pension. The heritability of some government benefits is a whole ‘nother subject, but this, too, could be solved simply by College services do and removing the concept of “marriage” from the law altogether.

All of this said, I will probably vote in favor of Proposition 8. Paper Introduction Proposal? If we can’t get government out of the marriage business altogether, we can at essay services don ts, least get them to define it in a manner that most Californians can stomach. Perhaps you should get over yourself, Boonton. You’re really not smart enough to call other people stupid so freely. I’ve only called 3 people here stupid. Try to think of it in a positive way….you’re like a member of an Nursing research introduction, elite force here….

Most people don’t need a “legal incentive” to stay monogamous, even before they are married. … Like I said I think it is missing something to describe marriage as an ‘incentive for monogamoy’. Uf Admission? It is more accurate to describe it as a challenge (in lots of things, not just monogamy). A challenge has positives but it also has difficulties. For most the knowledge that infidelity would severely damage or destroy a relationship is enough, but apparently that is Nursing research proposal not enough for gays, who need a government bribe. You don’t get a gov’t bribe for being monogamous in a marriage. Did I miss something, is California giving out coupons for free ice cream for married gay couples who don’t cheat? And I notice you dodged my other point, if the essay building only point here is the fuzzy happy thought of a relationship why have marriage at all? Why don’t people just live with each other as they please and if that turns out to be a life long relationship great if not ahhh well? Your view of marriage seems to not only make it unneeded for Nursing paper gays but for everyone.

Channelling a bit of Hugh Hefner today are we? I agree wholeheartedly with you that getting government altogether out of the issue is the preferable course (as I argued in the thread on Challenges writing the former post on the subject). Christians err when they want representative government to make it safe to believe in paper introduction, Christianity. The only Love essay danger that concerns me as an American is the loss of freedom of speech under hate crime regimens. JustMakingItUp: Hi, I’m Richard Hollis. Actually I meant that I literally couldn’t follow the links, as I had only received a draft version of Dustin’s original essay by Nursing research paper proposal e-mail, and the links were not attached. To be fair, I do take your point that it was the weakest part of my response because I was speaking from an emotional point rather than a logical one. Essay Services? My hunch was to reject these statistics out of Nursing paper introduction, hand because they seemed so over-inflated, and this of course, would not have been a reasonable thing to do if I could have followed the links.

However, I still think my hunch was justified. Building? Statistics like this (when people are presumably interviewed and asked to Nursing research introduction proposal, simply tell the truth) are generally notoriously difficult for a number of reasons. Writing A Paper? For one thing, people lie. It may be that the researcher has discovered a tendancy in gay men to paper introduction proposal, exaggerate their sexual conquests. It may be that the research involved heterosexual people who were still in relationships (and therefore more likely to College services, lie about their infidelities). It may even be that the researchers were not impartial, and research paper introduction proposal actively wanted to find that gay men were promiscuous, and so deliberately asked heterosexual people who seemed straight-laced and monogamous, and homosexual people who seemed rather… well… sluttish (for want of a better word). A lot of work needs to go into making sure legitimate scientific studies are impartial, objective, and paper wherever possible, double-blinded. Nursing Research Proposal? And that is before you even study the implications of the service findings.

But yes, now I can access the research paper introduction links, I intend to read up on these studies (I still have not done so yet). It should make interesting reading. In theory I’m not against your libertarian take on marriage but I’m not sure it is as practical as you depict to simply replace all of it with a bunch of contracts. For example, some states still have spousal privilege when it comes to criminal trials, I don’t see how you can replicate that in a private contract. Even if you’re willing to dispense with privilege, there are other legal implications to getting married that are bit complicated. For example, you are legally obligated for the debts your spouse incurs for necessities like medical care. This obviously has a public policy benefit….Donald Trump’s wife can’t ask for charity care on the grounds that she has no job and her husband doesn’t want to writing voucher, foot the bill but I don’t think you could manufacture it by Nursing paper having your spouse carry around a private contract. JustMakingItUp – Hi, I’m Richard Hollis. Actually, the Biology voucher reason I was not able to access the link is Nursing introduction that I had only Uf admission building received a draft of Dustin’s post via e-mail and the links were not attached. I do take your point that it was the research paper proposal weakest part of my response. I was taking an emotional stance rather than a logic one.

I was dismissing the studies out of College essay do and, hand simply because they seemed too over-inflated, and this would have been totally unreasonable of me had I been able to access the links. However, I don’t think I was totally unjustified. Studies such as these (where people are presumably asked to research, fill out surveys and Love questions trusted to tell the truth) are notoriously fraught with difficulties. For one thing, people lie. Research Paper Introduction? It may be that the researchers actually found a tendancy in homosexuals to exaggerate their sexual conquests. Perhaps the review service heterosexuals interviewed were in relationships, and therefore less likely to admit to any infidelities. Nursing Research? Perhaps the researchers themselves were biased, and actively wanted to prove homosexuals were more promiscuous, and so deliberately selected people they expected to give the results they wanted to hear. It is extremely important (and difficult) to make sure such studies are truly objective, impartial, double-blinded (where possible), and even accurate. And that is before we even discuss the implications of the findings.

But now I have the delivery links, I intend to follow them (I still have not done so yet). Nursing Research? I’m sure they will make interesting reading. JustMakingItUp – Hi, I’m Richard Hollis. Actually, the reason I was not able to access the writing a paper link is that I had only received a draft of Dustin’s post via e-mail and the links were not attached. I do take your point that it was the weakest part of my response. I was taking an emotional stance rather than a logic one.

I was dismissing the studies out of hand simply because they seemed too over-inflated, and this would have been totally unreasonable of me had I been able to access the links. However, I don’t think I was totally unjustified. Studies such as these (where people are presumably asked to Nursing research paper, fill out surveys and trusted to tell the truth) are notoriously fraught with difficulties. For one thing, people lie. It may be that the researchers actually found a tendancy in homosexuals to exaggerate their sexual conquests. Perhaps the College essay services do and heterosexuals interviewed were in relationships, and therefore less likely to admit to any infidelities. Nursing Research Introduction? Perhaps the researchers themselves were biased, and actively wanted to prove homosexuals were more promiscuous, and so deliberately selected people they expected to give the results they wanted to hear.

It is extremely important (and difficult) to make sure such studies are truly objective, impartial, double-blinded (where possible), and with phd proposal university even accurate. And that is Nursing research introduction before we even discuss the implications of the findings. But now I have the links, I intend to follow them (I still have not done so yet). I’m sure they will make interesting reading. Ooops. Sorry about that… I do take your point that it was the Dissertation review service weakest part of my response.

I was taking an emotional stance rather than a logic one. I was dismissing the studies out of hand simply because they seemed too over-inflated, and this would have been totally unreasonable of me had I been able to Nursing research introduction proposal, access the links. The studies probably are overinflated, outdated and distorted in some or many respects but the larger issue is ‘so what’. Statistics are always in flux and it is always possible to create the numbers that suit your agenda, and by create I don’t mean lie but simply choose your subjects carefully to get the results you want. How about the divorce rate for A-level celebrities who marry within two years of their first cover on People magazine? Domestic abuse rates for couples that meet at AA or NA meetings perhaps? If I told you bloggers have a 97% failure rate at marriage how would you feel about the state telling you it’s not going to let you get married for do and don ts the sake of the ‘institution’? Great post!!

I invite everyone to read the post on http://editorialsection.com. I haven’t visited Evangelical Outpost for quite a while. Now that I return it feels like Charlton Heston returning to earth in Planet of the Apes. Is this some kind of Emergent Evangelicalism? From these comments, and those on other threads, it appears that many evangelicals support a redefinition of marriage and the family – beginning with gender, moving on I presume to number. A large number seem poised to research introduction, support a candidate most distinguished for his promise to sweep away even the university smallest impediments to the killing of unborn children as one of his first acts in introduction proposal, office. Freedom of the Gospel, indeed.

This kind of freedom appears set to bind our nation for Dissertation service delivery a very long time. (Note: BitterClinger is merely a screenname, not intended to imply any relationship to Jamie Farr, his family or associates.) I think both authors have thoughtfully expressed their opinions, and I applaud their efforts. This is the kind of reasoned discourse that, while it might not lead to consensus, keeps open the doors of communication. Research Paper? Thank you, Mr.

Steeve and Mr. Hollis for your contributions. You have given me much to Challenges writing a paper, ponder. I’ve only called 3 people here stupid. Try to think of it in a positive way….you’re like a member of an elite force here…. As I said, you are not smart enough to call anybody stupid. Perhaps you should stop trying to justify it. Like I said I think it is missing something to describe marriage as an ‘incentive for monogamoy’. Then talk to Ebonmuse, he was the research introduction proposal one that asserted it was needed. Though, he is when writing a paper justification far from the only “gay marriage” advocate to use that argument. What is sad is that people use Christianity when it is research proposal convenient for them.

The verses most Christians use against homosexuality, if looked at closer, condemn those that would use them. If you do follow the Bible, Homosexuality is a sin. Guess what so is Adultery! We don’t have a problem with our kids seeing a man and woman sin on TV but two men or two women and God’s gonna burn your TV! You can’t convince someone to desire to be Holy unless you can demonstrate what Holy is. It’s Planks and Splinters. No I don’t agree with homosexuality but I’m tired of people living with their girlfriend out of wedlock and Telling a Gay couple they will burn in Love essay questions, Hell. Then talk to Ebonmuse, he was the one that asserted it was needed. Though, he is Nursing research paper far from the only “gay marriage” advocate to use that argument. If you want to conduct private debates then take it to email, otherwise any argument posted on a comment board is fair game for criticism by when writing anyone who reads it. From these comments, and those on other threads, it appears that many evangelicals support a redefinition of marriage and the family – beginning with gender, moving on paper introduction proposal I presume to with phd proposal, number.

Nah, the comments you see that support the redefinition of marriage and family are the atheists, Cafeteria Christians, and others that nay-say evangelicals and purport to tell everybody they aren’t tolerant enough (never mind the fact that Christ didn’t tolerate sin). The comments made by others tend to introduction, get lost in paper, the shuffle or drown out by the comments from the self-appointed arbiters of research paper introduction, intelligence, tolerance, and Love essay enlightenment. If you want to conduct private debates then take it to email, otherwise any argument posted on a comment board is Nursing research paper fair game for criticism by anyone who reads it. What’s amazing about this whole discourse, is that Boonton calls me stupid. Here’s the path: Ebonmuse asserts that gays need the incentive of marriage to practice monogamy. I point out how silly that is and if it’s true (which it could be, he is not the only gay marriage supporter to put forward that argument), gays obviously have bigger problems than not being able to Biology writing, be married. Boonton calls me stupid for saying gays need an incentive to be monogamous, while at the same time showing that he doesn’t understand what an incentive is (here’s a clue, marriage is the incentive). Now that I look at it, I find myself starting to agree with Boonton; I am stupid.

Who but an idiot would get stuck in orbit around the Nursing research introduction black hole of stupidity that is Boonton? It doesn’t look as if the original author of this post intends to address my point. Unfortunate. ucfengr, you have twisted my words. I did not say that gays “need the when justification incentive of research paper introduction proposal, marriage to practice monogamy”. That is obviously false: the large numbers of gay couples who are already living in monogamous relationships, fighting for the right to paper writing service, have those relationships legally recognized, is disproof enough of that. But if you think monogamy is a good thing, as I assume you do, then why would you be opposed to giving people additional incentives to practice it? If you’re opposed to “bribing” people to be monogamous, do you also think we should roll back the tax exemptions and other benefits offered to heterosexual married couples? The selective application of logic when it comes to Nursing introduction proposal, anti-gay-marriage arguments never ceases to astonish. Review? Are some gays promiscuous? No doubt.

And something like 50% of research paper proposal, heterosexual marriages end in divorce. Does that also prove that straight people are inherently promiscuous and don’t deserve access to phd proposal, marriage either? do you also think we should roll back the tax exemptions and Nursing other benefits offered to heterosexual married couples? Most of those tax incentives or exemptions occur for dependent children. If the couple both work and earn extra money, their taxes can often be higher when their combined income pushes them into the higher tax bracket. Given how advocates brag about how homosexuals tend to earn more, that seems more likely to Help university, happen than not. Nursing Research Introduction Proposal? One other thing to note is that depending on how much a parent spends on writing a paper their child, that tax exemption does not really make a child any more affordable and only slightly mitigates the Nursing proposal expenses of Challenges when justification, raising children. Nursing Paper Introduction? So loosing the tax exemptions and College other supposed benefits given to heterosexual married couples would be worth it to me at least if it were to be traded for the elimination of monosexed marriage being recognized as valid by the government. Do you think that the advocates for monosexed marriage would quit seeking governmental recognition of Nursing proposal, their relationship as a valid marriage if the tax exemptions and other benefits were non-existent for do and heterosexual marriages?

I for research proposal one, do not think they would quit. Essay? I think bringing those things up is Nursing used as an evasion from having to talk about the true and underlying motives behind the activism. I’m pretty educated in religion and theology (masters degrees in both). i lean pretty heavily on the conservative side when it comes to with phd proposal university, issues of homosexuality, bottom line, i disagree with it and Nursing proposal don’t think it’s right or moral. Help University? With that said i would still not vote for proposition 8. I think the homosexual community should have the right to marriage and things that go with marriage. Paper Introduction Proposal? I also don’t agree with the Biology paper Muslim faith and many other faiths and practices but i still think Islamic people should have the right to get married.

I think it’s a smoke screen to research introduction, think that the liberal illuminati are going to take over the country and gays are going to be the Help phd proposal xavier down fall of marriage. I simply don’t believe that to be true. People, specifically people who claim to follow Jesus need to get serious about paper introduction proposal, marriage before they start wanting to paper service voucher, defend it in court. McCain being a huge example. This is America we believe in freedom of religion and equal right, i affirm those things and it’s it’s because of Nursing paper introduction, that that i think homosexuals should be able to marry. I really don’t see how someone well versed in religion and theology can counter Jesus’ definition of marriage – one man and one woman.

To do so implies that you find suspect at least one of Love essay questions, his teachings. The question then becomes – How many more after that do you find suspect such that you can no longer say you whole-heartedly believe what Jesus taught? Boonton calls me stupid for saying gays need an incentive to be monogamous, while at the same time showing that he doesn’t understand what an paper proposal, incentive is (here’s a clue, marriage is the Dissertation service delivery incentive). It’s stupid to describe marriage as a bribe by the gov’t to Nursing research paper introduction proposal, be monogamous. Help With Phd Proposal University? Marriage does indeed have incentives to be monogamous but it’s a lot more complicated than that.

It is a challenge to reap the Nursing research paper proposal rewards of mutual monogamy….the description of a marriage as a contract is very apt. In a contract, both parties agree to give something up in exchange for something else. It is assumed they enter a contract because they deem this to be a fair trade. Yes it is College essay services possible for Nursing introduction one side to cheat (example, you accept the inventory but refuse to questions, pay the vendor) so contract law has incentives for both sides not to research introduction, cheat. The point of that, though, is not for the gov’t to bribe people into honoring their contracts. Smmtheory – hello again. I just had to post to correct you, but Jesus did not say anything about homosexuality at all. Nothing. College Don Ts? Not one thing. Which is odd in itself; if homosexuality is such a great sin, you’d think he’d at least MENTION it once…

To the research people who say ‘No’ on prop 8. How about changing the definition of review delivery, marriage as partnering with any preference such as man-to-dog? woman-to-pig. Do you like it? How about redefining of “dependent” in introduction proposal, tax law by changing it and adoption of a dog can be allowed for tax exemption for dependent? Can you accept it?

Let’s keep the Biology writing voucher common sense. Request for Nursing paper proposal Same sex marriage has gone much higher beyond tolerance level of our society. Therfore, ‘YES’ on Prop 8 is absolutely necessary for our social health. Jeong, that is a ridiculous comparrison. Essay Building? A marriage is a union of two consenting equals.

You cannot marrying a dog because a dog has no idea what it is doing. Nursing? It does not understand marriage, let alone consent to it. Therefore it is not a fair comparrison. Two men or two women can love each other as deeply and sincerely as a man and a woman. Requesting same-sex marriage does not go beyond tolerance at all. How about changing the definition of marriage as partnering with any preference such as man-to-dog? woman-to-pig. Do you like it?

Not really, I see no argument in favor of man-dog or woman-pig marriages. I see a very good one against it which is that dogs and pigs are not humans. Last time I checked, gays are. How about Love essay questions, redefining of research paper, “dependent” in tax law by changing it and adoption of a dog can be allowed for tax exemption for dependent? Can you accept it? Well anyone can be a dependent in tax law….if you are taking care of someone, I think the test is essay building provide at research paper introduction, least half their expenses and that is services do and don ts more than $5K a year…..as for expanding that to dogs, I’d love that as I have two dogs….but I suppose it would be wiser to use a tax exemption to help someone keep their home or cloth their kids. Once it is allowed to redefine marriage as you prefer for Homosexuality, anybody might be able to research introduction, redefine it according to their preference without restriciton. In that case, this society will be in mess to define what is right or wrong and what can be tolerant or banned. Without certain restriction of human freedom according to writing justification, common social welfare, evetually this society will be uncontrolable and return to very primitive society.

If you think that man-to-man marriage is acceptable while man-to-dog is not acceptable just because dog is not humanbeing, it is research paper proposal completely ccontradictory logic because the man who prefer dog instead of humang being will be discriminated aaccording to your strange logic of ‘NO’ side of prop 8. If you think there is Help with phd proposal xavier no problem to choose your partner for marriage with same sex, why does it become problem for a person to choose a dog as marriage partner. You have to keep in mind that there can be some weird people who prefer animals to humanbeing naturally, as you insist that homosexuality is Nursing research paper proposal innate. Let’s have common sense and logic… The same sex marriage should not be tolerated in the health society. ‘YES’ on Prop 8…it should be for you and me and my children and future generation and Challenges writing all human being. I just had to post to correct you, but Jesus did not say anything about Nursing, homosexuality at all. Nothing.

Not one thing. Which is odd in itself; if homosexuality is such a great sin, you’d think he’d at Help with xavier, least MENTION it once… Well, let’s put it this way, homosexual sex is sex outside of marriage, which Jesus did have something to research paper proposal, say about. And since his definition of marriage was between one man and one woman, I think that kind of means that when Jesus thinks sex outside of marriage is sinful, that includes homosexual type. And for those who thought that was unfair, Jesus recommended celibacy. Homosexual activity doesn’t exactly qualify as celibacy either. So there you have it, Jesus’ teaching on sex – either to your opposite sex spouse, or not at all. Why should teaching against Love essay questions, homosexual sex outside of that be necessary when that covers it all? Actually, Jesus never said anything about sex, period, except to condemn lust and adultery. He never condemned premarital sex. He did say, according to Nursing paper introduction, one gospel, that divorce is Love essay never permissible.

This is introduction why the Help with xavier university Catholic church doesn’t allow divorce. Nursing Paper Introduction? Another gospel has him saying that divorce is permissible if one’s partner has committed adultery. He seems to College services do and don ts, clearly condemn remarriage after divorce. Various churches and scholars have differed sharply on what Jesus really meant about divorce and whether one can ever divorce or ever remarry after a divorce. If Christians are serious about having the law reflect Jesus’ teachings on marriage, they should push for a constitutional amendment banning divorce, except for scriptural causes. Research Paper Introduction Proposal? A special religious court could be set up to determine whether a divorce or remarriage is Biology paper writing service allowed under biblical guidelines. Also, the US should never elect someone who has committed adultery, divorced his wife without just cause and remarried. Like John McCain.

Once it is allowed to redefine marriage as you prefer for Nursing research paper introduction Homosexuality, anybody might be able to College do and don ts, redefine it according to their preference without restriciton. I don’t recall anyone saying anything about preference, IMO it is about being fair and decent. Research Introduction Proposal? I’m sorry, no one has presented a convincing argument for human-dog marriages but feel free to try. If you think that man-to-man marriage is acceptable while man-to-dog is not acceptable just because dog is not humanbeing, it is completely ccontradictory logic because the man who prefer dog instead of Challenges, humang being will be discriminated aaccording to your strange logic of ‘NO’ side of research introduction, prop 8. True a man who wants to service voucher, marry a dog doesn’t get his way. So what? A dog still isn’t a human and last time I checked is not able to Nursing research paper, enter contracts, not able to make informed consent, in general doesn’t have the intelligence that a human does….even very stupid humans. You have to keep in Love essay, mind that there can be some weird people who prefer animals to humanbeing naturally, as you insist that homosexuality is innate. But animals can’t prefer humans, at least not in the sense that you need them to prefer to make a marriage (and I do hope you acknowledge marriage isn’t just about having sex).

There are humans in this category as well. For example, you can’t marry someone whose in a coma. If Christians are serious about having the law reflect Jesus’ teachings on marriage, they should push for Nursing research paper proposal a constitutional amendment banning divorce, except for scriptural causes. The way it was before No-Fault divorce laws were written in Biology, other words. Christians were steamrolled on that one too. One of the arguments against No-Fault divorce laws was that we would end up where we are today with a 50% divorce rate. A lot of good it did them to try to talk common sense into the activists and meddlers back then. And would you and research paper introduction the other proponents of monosexed “marriage” be sanguine about throwing out No-Fault divorce laws?

HECK NO! You would fight it as nastily as you fight marriage definition amendments. Don’t even pretend otherwise. I advocate getting rid of the No-Fault laws, but that’s not where the current fight is taking place. Suggesting that that is where we should take the Help phd proposal xavier fight is kind of like a bait-and-switch tactic, or pointing off to space somewhere behind your opponents back and saying “What’s that?” knowing full well that you will be trying to dodge around your opponent if he gets distracted by your ruse. A special religious court could be set up to determine whether a divorce or remarriage is allowed under biblical guidelines. The annulment process in Nursing research paper introduction, the Catholic Church.

He never condemned premarital sex. Here’s the thing about pre-marital sex. It leads to adultery in phd proposal xavier university, one way or another. First, if a man has sex with a woman prior to marrying her, the religious view is that they should formalize the marriage they consumated. If they don’t, and paper introduction proposal then later that man gets married to a different woman, he has retroactively committed adultery. Now some people might consider the second sexual relationship the Help xavier university adulterous one, some might consider the first relationship the adulterous one in a kind of front-loaded sort of way. Either way, the adultery has been committed. And not just for that man, but having not married the woman he had intercourse with in Nursing paper proposal, the first place, they are both causing each other to commit adultery which is compounding the sin. Also, the US should never elect someone who has committed adultery, divorced his wife without just cause and remarried.

Like John McCain. We are electing a President of the country, not electing somebody to be a saint. Isn’t it a little bit hypocritical to writing, be saying his adultery should disqualify him when you have said Bill Clinton’s adultery wasn’t such a big deal? It is surely true that there will be nobody who want to marry with dog. Nursing Research Paper? However my point is Biology paper service that, if all the effort for redefinition for same sex marriage is allowed, then marriage can be redefined according to any preference. And also we can allow redefining of all other social terms. What if redefining adult? Let’s say for Nursing paper introduction proposal example, somebody want to marry with 7 years old kid, it is prohibited at paper service, present time. However, with the similar logic of paper introduction proposal, requesting for same sex marriage, somebody can complain and appeal for the permit of the Uf admission essay kind marriage with kid.

If law enforce that kid does not have dicernment of right or wrong about the marriage, it is discriminating the kid, according to paper, your logic. Acutally, there have been some other countries where marriage with 7 years old has been allowed. Of course, I cannot tolerate for kid to marry with adult. Likewise I cannot tolerate for the marriage between same sex. Dissertation Review Service Delivery? Mature society should be able to set rules and restrict some freedom for common welfare. Clearly you put a lot of effort into thinking through and depicting your position in Nursing paper, favor of Proposition 8. However, your argument suffers from enough deficiencies that it fails to support your conclusion. Marriage is Dissertation review service a fundamental building block of society. That phrase is often used but seldom explained. Nursing? When I say “fundamental building block of society” I am referring to marriage’s natural creation of with phd proposal university, families. You conflate two terms here, marriage and families, base your position on the latter, and then use indirection to research introduction proposal, corral the former. Families are the building block of society.

Civil marriage is a legal construct to original purpose was to protect the property rights of services, women and research introduction proposal the children that were, until the Uf admission building Pill, the eventually nearly inevitable outcome of sex. Clearly, protecting the property rights of dependents is research proposal important. However, in linking families and marriage as you do, you are appealing to the same notions of human nature that animate the left: our nature and Uf admission essay building actions are determined by society. I doubt very much you believe that; in fact, I’ll bet you believe precisely the opposite. However, without that underlying assumption, your conflation fails. And, along the way, it denigrates religious marriage, which sanctifies monogamy regardless of secular legal constructs. According to research paper introduction, A. Dean Byrd, Ph.D, “There is no fact that has been established by social science literature more convincingly than the following: all variables considered, children are best served when reared in Challenges when a paper, a home with a married mother and father.” I think that is close enough to objective truth to take as stipulated. However, as a practical matter, it is presents . Within the research introduction realm of human affairs, there will always be some children who do not have such an environment available to them. Even more sadly, there are children for whom there are few options.

In order to complete that statement, it needs to consider those children for College services do and whom the options are two: an series of foster parents, or adoption by a same-sex couple. Appealing to the advisability of married mother and father for children is Nursing introduction pointless if that option is not on offer. Which leaves the question that matters open and Love unaddressed: which is introduction proposal least bad, being raised by a married same-sex couple, or foster care? As an aside, SFAIK, same sex couples may adopt children in most, if not all, of the 50 states. Whether that is a good idea or not is a subject for a separate thread that should always keep in mind the options on offer. … the same-sex culture still has elements of great concern which we ought to consider before we introduce these elements into marriage. Pain and suffering resulting from sexual disease permeate homosexual communities. According to ex-gay speaker Mike Haley, the Help with phd proposal odds of a straight man contracting AIDS after one heterosexual encounter are 1 in 165,000 as opposed to 1 in 175 for gay men after one homosexual encounter. I don’t have the paper introduction time to prove it, but, notionally, that latter number cannot possibly be correct. Presume gay men are something like as promiscuous as you believe them to be: 5 different partners per month. If the odds of a gay man contracting AIDS are in fact 1 in paper service, 175 unique encounters, then essentially all gay men are dead.

Except they aren’t, so that stat needs some explaining. More fundamentally, though, let’s take all those statistics as stipulated. So far as I know, Evangelists agree that mankind is fallen. Your statistics, at best, show that gays are somewhat more fallen than the rest of research paper proposal, us. Which demands the question: is essay do and there a fallenness threshold beyond which marriage is not allowed? If so, then you need to show it, and how gays fall on proposal the far side. Otherwise, these stats, even if true, do not advance your argument even an inch towards its goal. Your moral framework needs foremost to Love essay questions, be informed by deciding up front whether morality applies to the situation at hand. In order for something to assess the morality of something, one must first know the extent to introduction proposal, which that thing involves a choice. For instance, (although Christians once thought otherwise), there is absolutely no moral component to Love, being left handed — there is Nursing research paper no choice in Dissertation service, the matter.

Similarly, no matter how much your evangelical Christian faith informs your moral framework, homosexuality is not a matter of Nursing introduction, choice. When A Paper? There simply is no moral component to being gay. Now, you may counter that while there is research paper no moral component to being gay, actualization of that fact is immoral. Unfortunately, not only does that leave you on the horns of the Euthryphro dilemma, it also presents you with a theodicy problem: why would God create a group of people and then demand that others ostracize, and even kill, them? One need not be a Christian in order to have a compelling moral argument against homosexuality.

For example, you might be Aristotelian. If so, you might consider the anatomical design of College services do and don ts, men and women and conclude that homosexual sex is against the proper function of humans. As it happens, all mammals start existence as females. Nursing Research Paper Introduction? It is questions only through the Y-linked expression of hormones during gestation that a female body plan becomes male. What would an Aristotelian make of that? Particularly when informed the Jamie Lee Curtis is, by Aristotelian standards, male? Your argument in research introduction, favor of Prop-8, the Help with phd proposal result of which is to impose a sectarian notion upon a non-sectarian society, simply fails to proposal, make its case. Challenges A Paper Justification? The task facing you is to convince the rest of us that allowing gays to marry will somehow corrode marriages for Nursing paper heterosexuals.

As others have noted (Boonton, perhaps), no amount of mayhem to to which groups of essay, heterosexuals are particularly prone constitutes a barrier to marriage, yet requires such for gays. You attempt to make a moral case, but the very foundation of that argument disappears in the absence of choice. Finally, you make an appeal to Nursing research proposal, anatomical design without acknowledging its basics or contingencies. Your position makes perfect sense for writing service voucher insisting evangelical Christians refuse the marriage sacrament to gays. However, it completely fails to proposal, make a case for Uf admission similarly restricting civil marriage. The way it was before No-Fault divorce laws were written in other words. Christians were steamrolled on that one too. Nursing Research? One of the arguments against No-Fault divorce laws was that we would end up where we are today with a 50% divorce rate. Whose this ‘we’ here?

Christians? If you’re not supposed to get a divorce except for scriptual reasons then don’t get a divorce except. Are we at the point here where you’re telling us gay marriage must be banned (and no-fault divorce abolished) because Christians need the gov’t to bribe them into following their religion? The annulment process in the Catholic Church. Last time I checked it was alive and Love essay well and Nursing research paper proposal hasn’t fallen even though it is highly unpopular among other Christians, not supported by civil marriage law and is even unpopular among many Catholics. We are electing a President of the country, not electing somebody to be a saint. Isn’t it a little bit hypocritical to be saying his adultery should disqualify him when you have said Bill Clinton’s adultery wasn’t such a big deal? I guess we just expected something more from someone from the ‘pro-American’ portion of the country. It’s not the first time smmtheory has disappointed. It is surely true that there will be nobody who want to marry with dog.

However my point is that, if all the effort for redefinition for same sex marriage is allowed, then marriage can be redefined according to essay questions, any preference. Your error is assuming the argument in paper introduction, favor of Dissertation service, gay marriage is simply “well that’s what some gays prefer and research paper proposal we should always do what people prefer”. That is not the stand supporters of essay, gay marriage have taken for the simple reason that it is an research paper introduction, impossible stand to take. People of essay, contradictory preferences, you would rather there be no gay people, some others would rather everyone be gay, others yet would rather be allowed to drive around with a nuclear bomb in Nursing paper, their trunk. What if redefining adult? Let’s say for example, somebody want to Challenges when justification, marry with 7 years old kid, it is prohibited at present time. …. Of course, I cannot tolerate for kid to Nursing introduction proposal, marry with adult. Likewise I cannot tolerate for the marriage between same sex. Mature society should be able to Dissertation review delivery, set rules and restrict some freedom for research paper introduction common welfare.

And you yourself introduce the problem with your argument as well as the solution to the question you pose. Instead of asking why societal terms should ever be redefined, ask the reverse question, when are restrictions on freedoms good for the common welfare. When you look at review service, it from that angle a lot of Nursing research proposal, these questions suddenly get a lot easier. Help Xavier? Interracial marriage bans? A restriction on freedom that harms the Nursing paper introduction proposal common welfare therefore it was proper that they were abolished. Marriage of 7 yr olds? Big common welfare problem. How about marriage of Love essay questions, 17 yr olds? Well that’s a bit iffier so states of paper introduction, differing rules. Essay? Since your argument doesn’t connect the dots, doesn’t demonstrate how gay marriage would harm the common welfare, I don’t think it makes it.

I don’t have the research introduction proposal time to prove it, but, notionally, that latter number cannot possibly be correct. Presume gay men are something like as promiscuous as you believe them to be: 5 different partners per month. 1. This is essay services do and don ts kind of technical but why should one assume a bell curve distribution of research introduction proposal, gay promiscuity rather than say a power law distribution? The bell curve fits certain sets of data like height. Most people are a few inches around the ‘average height’ with fewer and fewer people more distant from that average. A power law follows a distribution like income. If you calculate the average income by exluding the richest 0.05% you’ll get a radically lower number than if you include them. Removing a few thousand of America’s tallest people will not dramatically alter the paper voucher average height of paper introduction, all Americans. 2. Given this possibility, even if 5 in 1 is the Help with xavier population average there are gay men who are less than 5 in one..

Possibly a great number with a smalle portion being ‘super promiscious’ enough to paper proposal, impact the average dramatically. 3. Phd Proposal Xavier? Again given this, are there no gay men who have no partners per month? Who, for whatever reason, have not had any sex or haven’t had any in a while? Or perhaps are having (gay) sex on rare occassions like what we suspect of Nursing paper introduction proposal, Idaho’s Senator Larry Craig? How does the Biology writing voucher study capture these men and add their data to paper introduction proposal, properly calculate the a paper average? If part of your argument is hitched to a social science statistic then you’re on a foundation of sand and one of the worse things you can do is paper introduction proposal read too much into an average. The ‘we’ here is American society at large. Dissertation Service? That 50% divorce rate is what is generally quoted for American society as a whole, not just Christians alone. But you kind of Nursing research paper, prove my point about how advocates for review service delivery monosexed “marriage” would fight against repeal of No-Fault just as nastily as they fight for research proposal monosexed “marriage”.

Last time I checked it was alive and well and hasn’t fallen even though it is paper writing service highly unpopular among other Christians, not supported by civil marriage law and is even unpopular among many Catholics. It still fits the bill of what ex-preacher was suggesting should or rather could happen. Research Paper Introduction? What’s your point? I don’t know why you continue to a paper, presume to research paper introduction, speak for Christians when you are not one. I guess we just expected something more from someone from the ‘pro-American’ portion of the country.

It’s not the first time smmtheory has disappointed. Well, yes, I can see where you would be disappointed about having your hypocrisy with respect to adultery pointed out. After all, isn’t hypocrisy considered the gravest of all sins among the moral relativists? It still fits the bill of what ex-preacher was suggesting should or rather could happen. What’s your point?

I don’t know why you continue to presume to speak for essay Christians when you are not one. I speak only for Nursing paper proposal myself and I feel sorry for College essay services don ts any group that requires you to speak for them. As for the Catholic Church, I fail to see the paper introduction proposal problem. If you abide by essay questions their teachings about marriage, you will not get remarried if divorced despite the fact that civil law has no objection (and many evangelical churchs might welcome your remarriage with open arms). Paper Proposal? The Catholic Church doesn’t require the essay gov’t to bribe people to research introduction, follow their teachings, why do you? Well, yes, I can see where you would be disappointed about essay, having your hypocrisy with respect to adultery pointed out. Nursing Paper Introduction Proposal? After all, isn’t hypocrisy considered the gravest of all sins among the moral relativists? 1. You failed to Uf admission building, point out any hypocrisy on my part or anyone elses. 2. I’m not a moral relativist, but wouldn’t a ‘gravest sin’ among relativists be something of a contradiction? Kind of like an underdressed nudist? There is huge misunderstanding from ‘No’ side of prop 8. Most people in Nursing paper introduction, ‘No’ side of Dissertation service, prop 8 misuderstand that the the same sex marriage is research proposal one of civi right movement in line with the past civil right movement started in 1960s.

The past civil right movoment was not about ‘WHAT’ but about ‘HOW’. In other words, the movement has targeted to when a paper justification, break down twisted social hierachy in order to give all social members equality. The real civil right movement have never attempted to destroy fundamental ‘WHAT’ of this society. However the research introduction same sex marriage is quite different than the real civil right movement because it is targeting to destruct our society into complete mess and uncontrollable status. They are destroying the fundamental ‘WHAT’. IT WILL EVENTUALLY TRIGGER ‘THE END OF WORLD’. And actually the destruction path might be guaranteed for human_being just because of this disastful concept of same sex marriage. Look beyond 20 years from essay do and don ts, now and Nursing research paper introduction proposal consider how this world will be like.

I am very concerning for my next generation just because of this kind of sinful movement. Please look at Uf admission building, your conscience and watch for what will happen next. They are destroying the fundamental ‘WHAT’.IT WILL EVENTUALLY TRIGGER ‘THE END OF WORLD’. Do you always tune up the rhetoric when you’re losing an argument? Look beyond 20 years from now and consider how this world will be like. I see two likely possibilities: A: 20 years from now a tiny portion of paper introduction proposal, gays use gay marriage. University? Many that did got burned badly when failed relationships left them dividing assets and paying alimony to partners they no longer wanted to be with. B: 20 years from now a portion of gays use gay marriage. Like other demographic groups they have ‘success rates’ (defined as no divorces within 5 years of marriage) that are sometimes greater and Nursing research proposal sometiems smaller than heterosexuals as a whole or sub-cohorts of heterosexuals. In both cases the existence of gay marriage has no detectable impact on the far more popular heterosexual marriages (about 95% of Uf admission building, all marriages).

Like today some churches recognize gay marriages, others do not. There is probably more acceptance of gay marriage itself in Nursing research proposal, the population but again it is nearly impossible to detect any impact positive or negative on heterosexual marriage. Can you give us a plausible future scenario? I’ve asked several times now for ‘yes’ supporters to essay, show exactly how existence of marriage for a small minority group directly impacts their ability to be good husbands, wives, fathers, and mothers. Connect the dots for us.

The Catholic Church doesn’t require the gov’t to bribe people to follow their teachings, why do you? And just where do you think I do require the government to bribe people to follow the civic law? If there is a specific argument I have made, please point it out. As I have stated, I would gladly give up any supposed benefits the government apportions to research, marriage if it meant the advocates for monosexed marriage would quit advocating for Challenges when government recognition. I could care less whether or not churches outside of Christianity condone such practices. There have even been churches that were nominally inside of Christianity who have turned their backs on research paper introduction proposal Christianity and condoned such practices as monosexed marriage. What I do care about writing service, is the damage that is being done to children through the government recognition of monosexed marriages. Our laws should be used to protect the least able to protect themselves, and this is being used to run roughshod over the children by adults who refuse to be adults. 1. You failed to point out paper, any hypocrisy on my part or anyone elses.

2. Paper Writing Voucher? I’m not a moral relativist, but wouldn’t a ‘gravest sin’ among relativists be something of paper proposal, a contradiction? Kind of like an underdressed nudist? 1. College Essay Services Do And Don Ts? No, I didn’t fail to point it out, you failed to acknowledge that I pointed it out. It looks like you have a mental block against Nursing research paper, recognizing that you seem to have a problem with McCain’s adultery whereas you have no problem with Clinton’s. 2. Well if you talk like a moral relativist, you might ought to service, expect being pegged as a moral relativist, and hypocrisy IS a contradiction. Please read carefully my point in line. It is clear that the issue of “Interracial marriage bans” is Nursing paper introduction completly different with “Same sex marriage” issue. I believe that it was absolutely right to Help phd proposal, abolish the Interracial marriage bans. And also I STRONGLY supported for the other civil right movements of the past. Nursing Paper Introduction? However Homosexuality absolutely cannot be civil right movement, simply because it can destruct human_being.

If you can see further down the road, you might be able to see my point about why it can be disatrous to the human being and building next generation. What I do care about is the damage that is being done to children through the government recognition of monosexed marriages. Our laws should be used to protect the least able to protect themselves, and paper proposal this is being used to run roughshod over the children by adults who refuse to be adults. OK, please be specific here. Services Do And Don Ts? Children are generated by paper proposal heterosexuals except in with xavier, the rather limited case of test tube babies. So what exactly are you talking about?

looks like you have a mental block against recognizing that you seem to have a problem with McCain’s adultery whereas you have no problem with Clinton’s. I don’t have any particular problem with McCain’s adultery. I wasn’t part of his marriage, it is primarily his concern. I have my own problems to deal with. 2. Well if you talk like a moral relativist, you might ought to expect being pegged as a moral relativist, and Nursing research introduction proposal hypocrisy IS a contradiction. You ‘might ought’ put more effort into your own arguments. You asked a question and I tried to answer it as best I could. Please try to return the Help university favor. Research Introduction? Connect the dots for us because quite frankly I have no idea what you’re talking about and I suspect you’re pumping up the rhetoric without thinking about the Biology writing debts your reasoning and research introduction proposal logic skills are going to Biology paper, have to make good on. If part of your argument is hitched to a social science statistic then you’re on a foundation of sand and one of the Nursing paper proposal worse things you can do is read too much into an average.

Ii think we are in violent agreement here, but since my post turned out to be a festival of editing errors, I will restate. Dustin used a number of Biology service, statistics. Collectively, they beg disbelief. If homosexuals are both, as a group, promiscuous, and the rate of contracting AIDS is paper one in 175 unique encounters, then there are no homosexuals. Granted, I was exaggerating a little; I should have said there would be no, or very few, gays who survive past middle age. In other words, on the face of it, one of those two statistics must be wrong. Not that it matters, because, as you (at least I think it was you) pointed out above, applying such reasoning to gays, but neglecting to do so for heterosexuals, rather reeks of hypocrisy. As I have stated, I would gladly give up any supposed benefits the phd proposal university government apportions to marriage if it meant the research paper proposal advocates for writing a paper monosexed marriage would quit advocating for government recognition. So, let me get this straight. You want non-sectarian government to Nursing research, adopt a specifically sectarian position, while allowing sects to do whatever they want? Christianity defines homosexuality as immoral.

What if Christianity is College essay don ts wrong? It’s tedious work but it is often interesting to research paper, probe suspect stats a bit deeper. Whether it’s a political group or a company trying to sell you soap never underestimate how brazen statistics hawkers are with trying to snow their readers over. Xavier University? For example: 78% of lesbians have reported domestic abuse related problems. If you follow the link you find an unfootnoted statement that: “78% of Nursing research, lesbians report that they have either defended themselves or fought back against an abusive partner” First problem, it is not specified whether ‘partner’ is Love only female partners or female and male (there are lesbians who have had relationships with men you know). Second problem, the research paper proposal second page of this document lists ‘types of abuse’….including ‘instigates feelins of shame’ as part of sexual abuse, ‘financial abuse’ that includes using ‘monetary resources of the partner or of the relationship’ without the other’s consent….’beauty-ism’….basically this metric seems to include a lot more than what many of us think of Help with phd proposal xavier university, when we hear ‘domestic abuse’. This isn’t just your ‘Burning Bed’ stuff but also what a lot of heterosexual couples would consider fighting over money and so on. Not only that, if one partner in any relationship ever felt like they were being made to feel self conscious about their looks, intelligence, money or whatnot that too counts as ‘abuse’. What’s amazing isn’t so much a 78% abuse rate, it’s amazing that we don’t have a 100% rate for all relationships under this measure.

Another clue that we are seeing a distorted statistic, the research paper phrase: “18% of this group described their behavior as self-defense or ‘trading blow for justification blow or insult for insult'” Insult for insult? Are we talking about an accurate measure of introduction, abuse here or are we seeing an organization with good intentions over-hyping abuse? However, within the homosexual community, infidelity is the norm. Recent studies show that 95.6% of gay men report infidelity in their current relationship. Love Essay? Numerous studies reveal that, among self-described committed homosexual couples, each individual has had an average of 3-5 partners a year. This link is pretty amazing because it is an FRC one. What Dusty doesn’t tell us is: 29% of gay relationships in the study have lasted longer than 8 years. 29% lasted 4-7 years. 11% less than 1 year. This is a somewhat amzing 60% of relationships lasting 4 or more years.

Amazing because there is almost no legal status to hold the relationship together. It does indeed strike one as odd that gay men are enjoying 5 partners per month but at the same time a majority are sticking with one person for years. Here is the fact, conservatives know better. Research Introduction? Years ago feminists were complaining about the superbowel being a time of review service, record domestic violence of Nursing proposal, men against women. Challenges When Writing? Conservatives took apart the paper proposal numbers and demonstrated quite nicely there was no scientific basis to them at building, all.

So the right has…or at least had…the ability to talk intelligently about statistics. What accounts for this newfound ignorance? So, let me get this straight. Nursing Paper Proposal? You want non-sectarian government to adopt a specifically sectarian position, while allowing sects to do whatever they want? I don’t believe that it is specifically a sectarian position. When? A lot of non-believers think that monosexed “marriage” is research introduction invalid also, and may also believe that it is immoral. I don’t care to interfere in what the homosexuals do in the privacy of College services do and don ts, their own sects and homes.

I do believe though that the non-sectarian government should protect children from the research introduction proposal violence that such an arrangement entails. If homosexuals want to Challenges when a paper justification, pretend they are married, they should be allowed to pretend, but since their arrangement would not naturally produce children, children should be lawfully excluded from their midst. Christianity defines homosexuality as immoral. What if Christianity is wrong? Christianity isn’t wrong about research, that, but even if I grant you the position for argument’s sake, where is the Love questions harm of being told that it is immoral? If Christianity is right though, the harm is research introduction much worse thinking that it is not. It’s tedious work but it is often interesting to probe suspect stats a bit deeper. Whether it’s a political group or a company trying to sell you soap never underestimate how brazen statistics hawkers are with trying to snow their readers over.

For example: 78% of lesbians have reported domestic abuse related problems. If you follow the link you find an unfootnoted statement that: “78% of lesbians report that they have either defended themselves or fought back against an abusive partner” First problem, it is not specified whether ‘partner’ is only female partners or female and male (there are lesbians who have had relationships with men you know). Second problem, the second page of this document lists ‘types of abuse’….including ‘instigates feelins of shame’ as part of essay, sexual abuse, ‘financial abuse’ that includes using ‘monetary resources of the partner or of the relationship’ without the other’s consent….’beauty-ism’….basically this metric seems to include a lot more than what many of introduction proposal, us think of when we hear ‘domestic abuse’. This isn’t just your ‘Burning Bed’ stuff but also what a lot of heterosexual couples would consider fighting over money and so on.

Not only that, if one partner in Help phd proposal xavier, any relationship ever felt like they were being made to introduction, feel self conscious about their looks, intelligence, money or whatnot that too counts as ‘abuse’. What’s amazing isn’t so much a 78% abuse rate, it’s amazing that we don’t have a 100% rate for all relationships under this measure. Another clue that we are seeing a distorted statistic, the phrase: “18% of do and don ts, this group described their behavior as self-defense or ‘trading blow for blow or insult for insult'” Insult for insult? Are we talking about an accurate measure of abuse here or are we seeing an organization with good intentions over-hyping abuse? However, within the homosexual community, infidelity is the norm. Recent studies show that 95.6% of gay men report infidelity in Nursing paper introduction, their current relationship. Numerous studies reveal that, among self-described committed homosexual couples, each individual has had an average of 3-5 partners a year. This link is pretty amazing because it is an FRC one. What Dusty doesn’t tell us is: 29% of gay relationships in the study have lasted longer than 8 years.

29% lasted 4-7 years. 11% less than 1 year. This is a somewhat amzing 60% of Challenges writing a paper justification, relationships lasting 4 or more years. Amazing because there is almost no legal status to hold the relationship together. Nursing Research Introduction? It does indeed strike one as odd that gay men are enjoying 5 partners per month but at the same time a majority are sticking with one person for years. Here is the fact, conservatives know better.

Years ago feminists were complaining about the superbowel being a time of services don ts, record domestic violence of men against women. Conservatives took apart the numbers and research introduction demonstrated quite nicely there was no scientific basis to them at all. So the right has…or at least had…the ability to talk intelligently about statistics. What accounts for this newfound ignorance? I do believe though that the non-sectarian government should protect children from the violence that such an arrangement entails. What exactly are you talking about? What exactly are you talking about? I am referring to the violence done to children by exposing them to homosexuals pretending to be married to each other. Whether it’s a political group or a company trying to sell you soap never underestimate how brazen statistics hawkers are with trying to snow their readers over.

This is a somewhat amzing 60% of relationships lasting 4 or more years. Amazing because there is almost no legal status to hold the relationship together. It does indeed strike one as odd that gay men are enjoying 5 partners per questions month but at paper introduction, the same time a majority are sticking with one person for Challenges writing a paper years. Need I say more Mr. Statistics Hawker? So your not actually talking about gay marriage but children ‘exposed’ to gay couples. OK, next time please let us know before post 50 that we can ignore you. Need I say more Mr. Statistics Hawker? Nope, you guys are caught hawking bum stats.

I wouldn’t say anything more if I were you. I do believe though that the research introduction non-sectarian government should protect children from the when writing violence that such an arrangement entails. What point are you trying to paper introduction, make? Even if gay marriages to subject children to Dissertation review, some sort of unique violence (I don’t have time to track down the Nursing paper introduction proposal link, but IIRC, lesbian couples have a far lower rate of child abuse than heterosexual couples with one step parent, particularly where the Biology service voucher step parent is male), that really has nothing to do with gay marriage. Gays may already adopt children in many, if not most, states. In all states, they can produce children through artificial insemination or surrogate motherhood. If that is what bothers you, than is what you should be fighting against. However, as I mentioned above, even granting there is no fact that has been established by paper social science literature more convincingly than the Dissertation service delivery following: all variables considered, children are best served when reared in a home with a married mother and father , that forces a false dichotomy. For those children adopted by gay couples, the choice isn’t between a family with a mother and father, but rather between an adopted family, or endless foster care. Given the true choice on offer, which is best for children? Christianity isn’t wrong about that, but even if I grant you the position for argument’s sake, where is the Nursing paper proposal harm of don ts, being told that it is Nursing introduction proposal immoral?

Oh, the same kind of harm that comes from certain Hindu sects deciding those suffering from cleft palate are possessed by the devil, or certain Christian sects having (no longer, thank goodness) that being left handed meant the with phd proposal xavier same thing. I could go on, but I won’t, because the fatal weakness in that statement is paper introduction how utterly un-American it is. You are branding every member of a group by the presumed characteristics of that group. Love Essay? That is pure tribalism. In contrast, the American ideal rests upon individual merit. Branding an entire group immoral because of an innate characteristic reeks of the former. Which, BTW, is what makes the Christian / Islamic insistence that homosexuality is research paper introduction immoral so desperately wrong.

There is no morality without agency. Gays have no choice in the matter, any more than straights do. Sex acts have no inherent moral value. The moral value attending a sex act derives wholly from context: consensual sex within a monogamous relationship is moral, no matter the Uf admission building gender of the participants. To conclude otherwise, as I mentioned above, leaves you on the rocks of a theodicy problem for which you have no answer. What point are you trying to make. I do not remember the exact phraseology that Pope John Paul II used in saying it, but essentially he said that a homosexual couple raising a child does damage to that child. Branding an entire group immoral because of an innate characteristic reeks of the former. Which, BTW, is what makes the Christian / Islamic insistence that homosexuality is Nursing research introduction proposal immoral so desperately wrong.

There is no morality without agency. College Essay Do And Don Ts? Gays have no choice in the matter, any more than straights do. Not so, homosexuality is a choice, not an innate quality. Every consensual sex act requires a choice of whether to engage in it or not. The moral value attending a sex act derives wholly from context: consensual sex within a monogamous relationship is moral, no matter the gender of the participants. Setting aside the fact that I disagree about whether or not the moral value of a sex act derives entirely from the context, your context is out of whack. The only morally good context is between husband and wife. To conclude otherwise, as I mentioned above, leaves you on the rocks of a theodicy problem for which you have no answer. Given the proper context, there is Nursing introduction no need for theodicy, there is no conundrum, it is when a paper simple and straight-forward without nuance. Homosexual sex is not between husband and Nursing research paper wife, so it is Challenges when writing a paper therefore immoral. I do not remember the exact phraseology that Pope John Paul II used in saying it, but essentially he said that a homosexual couple raising a child does damage to Nursing paper, that child.

You’re right, such children should just be aborted. Uf Admission Building? More seriously, though, this has nothing to do with gay marriage. Research Introduction? The question to ask is what is the alternative? By definition adopted children are cases where, for whatever reason, the heterosexual parents are unable to implement the when a paper justification ideal for their child (whether it’s their fault or not). Paper Proposal? You can complain, I suppose, about children created through IVF for gay couples but the College do and question is what is the alternative? Would you rather have life with two gay parents or have no life at all? I do not remember the paper introduction exact phraseology that Pope John Paul II used in when writing, saying it, but essentially he said that a homosexual couple raising a child does damage to that child. With respect to what, exactly? While I haven’t checked up on this to be sure, I’ll bet all adoption agencies put homosexual couples way down the priority list.

That means, IIRC, gay couples are adopting children no one else will. So, I’ve asked before, and I’ll ask again: which is worse, adoption by a gay couple, or foster care? Not so, homosexuality is research introduction proposal a choice, not an innate quality. Homosexuality, i.e., possessing a mating preference for the same sex, is as innate as handedness or eye color. Orientation and action are two different things. Which leaves the Help with phd proposal xavier university theodicy problem still in front of you. You could relieve that problem by concluding that those who wrote the Bible presumed the drive behind same-sex acts was a choice, and, therefore, concluded — wrongly — that engaging in them was based upon paper proposal, choice. Of course, to do that would hole Biblical credibility below the water line. Heck of a place — stuck between the devil of theodicy, and Uf admission essay building the deep blue sea of discrediting the Bible. The only morally good context is Nursing research introduction proposal between husband and wife.

Why? What it it about homosexual sex that makes it immoral? Beware of the with university Euthyphros dilemma, BTW. Full disclosure: my brother is Nursing research paper introduction gay. Essay Services? Consequently, I have a fair amount of first hand experience with gays. The notion that they are somehow irredeemably immoral in ways the rest of us are not is Nursing paper introduction complete crap, and deserves precisely the same respect that, say, anti-Judaism does. Why are my posts not posting? It appears that if I post concerning the essay building subject at hand, no post. But if I post concerning . . . nothing . . . it posts. Nursing Research? Why? What does it mean when it says my post is being held by the owner of the blog?

This blog has a spam filter. Sometimes whenever there’s an issue that involves any sexuality-type of topic it snags comments, thinking they are spam. I sometimes email Joe when that happens or you can try to service delivery, rewrite your blog using slightly different words (like SSM instead of same sex marriage). I don’t know if Joe is still managing the filter or not so there might be no one at research proposal, the switch to approve comments that are held. It’s usually better to writing service voucher, rewrite your post because by the time the comment is Nursing research introduction proposal cleared people will mostly be reading only the newest comments at the bottom of the thread and will not notice that a comment has appeared in the center. “Not so, homosexuality is College a choice, not an innate quality.” I feel that this really is at Nursing proposal, the root of a lot of misunderstandings about homosexuality. Love Essay Questions? It is quite definitely not a choice. Trust me on this.

I’ve always found it an apt metaphor to compare homosexuality to left-handedness. Both are inbuilt preferences – inclinations towards certain behaviour. Most people are right-handed, just as most people are heterosexual. Homosexuals CAN teach themselves to sleep with women in the same way that a left-handed person CAN teach themselves to write or use scissors with their right hand, but it will always feel counter-intuitive for Nursing research introduction proposal them. For them, it will never feel (ironically considering common objections to homosexuality) natural. It is essay a choice whether to admit to yourself and others around you that you are gay. But you can no more change your sexual orientation than you can change which hand you prefer.

Just so you know, you’ve erected a straw man with you theodicy problem or the Bible’s wrong canard. The doctrine of original sin answers why someone’s sexual orientation can be perverted even from birth, and someone’s choice to Nursing research proposal, act on when writing a paper justification a sinful impulse is no excuse. Just because someone may like to steal…alot…is no excuse for Nursing proposal them to pillage the village. Wow! Maybe I’m in a little gay bubble in Love questions, Los Angeles, but all the gay couples I know (and I know a ton, mind you) are older and very monogamous.

In fact, they are quite boring. Nursing Paper Proposal? Some have adopted, and Dissertation review they are wonderful parents. I think many ignorant folk here imagine the gay community as just guys in ass-less chaps on research proposal a gay pride float. It would be like thinking of heterosexuals on Spring Break in Fort Lauderdale. I still haven’t heard from any of you a good argument on exactly how two women walking the aisle will personally ruin your own marriage. Whether it’s a political group or a company trying to sell you soap never underestimate how brazen statistics hawkers are with trying to phd proposal university, snow their readers over. And not long after you wrote that, in Nursing research proposal, the very same comment even, you started hawking statistics yourself. Review Delivery? Were you trying to snow the readers over? You made your own interpretation of statistics to proposal, favor your argument. This is a somewhat amzing 60% of relationships lasting 4 or more years. Amazing because there is almost no legal status to hold the Challenges writing relationship together.

It does indeed strike one as odd that gay men are enjoying 5 partners per month but at the same time a majority are sticking with one person for years. Would you think it so odd if the same statistics applied to research introduction proposal, married heterosexuals? I predict that you would not, and that you would attribute it to infidelity. You left unstated your implication that the statistics were contradictory and Challenges when wrong based on your assumption that there was no infidelity in the more or less long-term relationships between practicing homosexuals. And not long after you wrote that, in paper, the very same comment even, you started hawking statistics yourself.

Yea I looked at Help xavier, some of the reports that were being cited by YOU GUYS. You left unstated your implication that the statistics were contradictory and wrong based on your assumption that there was no infidelity in the more or less long-term relationships between practicing homosexuals. I certainly made no assumption that there would be no infidelity among long term gay couples nor did I assume that infidelity rates would be equal to or lower than heterosexual couples. Take a peek at post 48 if you need a refresher. I suspect all things being equal long term lesbian relationships would probably have lower infidelity rate than heterosexuals as a whole while long term gay male relationships would have a higher one…. Would you think it so odd if the same statistics applied to married heterosexuals? No but that’s not the point. The point is it’s pretty amazing if the only information you had was Richard’s sensationalistic reading of the primary sources.

While I haven’t checked up on this to be sure, I’ll bet all adoption agencies put homosexual couples way down the priority list. Some of Nursing introduction proposal, them, mostly religiously affiliated adoption services. I don’t believe that publicly funded adoption services do place homosexual couples below heterosexual couples. Catholic affiliated adoption services certainly do not place children with homosexual couples. Activists sometimes apply legal pressure to force them to, but usually that sort of Love, coercion only persuades them to shut down rather than operate against doctrinal beliefs and policy. Between the two choices of foster home care and research introduction placement with a homosexual couple, the foster home placement is preferable in my opinion. Homosexuality, i.e., possessing a mating preference for the same sex, is as innate as handedness or eye color.

To pick a nit with your statement… homosexual practice is not a mating practice. Homosexual acts can no more produce offspring than self pleasuring alone at Dissertation service, home. Paper Proposal? If a person really wants to mate, they go to the opposite sex. Preferences are choices. Putting little or no thought into College don ts, it does not make it any less a choice than a well thought out decision. Between the two choices of foster home care and Nursing placement with a homosexual couple, the Help with university foster home placement is preferable in Nursing introduction, my opinion. Florida, I believe, prohibits gay adoption but permits gay foster parents. Forcing a kid to Uf admission building, grow up with no real parents, to live on Nursing research introduction edge of being whisked away from the caretakers he lives with isn’t doing them any favors. The call that should be made here is what is best for the child, not the ideological fixations of the evangelical right. If they want to stop gay adoption they should swarm the adoption agencies with applications from well adjusted, happy heterosexual couples open to adding adopted and foster kids to their families. If they want to stop gay adoption they should swarm the Dissertation adoption agencies with applications from Nursing introduction, well adjusted, happy heterosexual couples open to adding adopted and foster kids to College essay, their families.

I totally agree! This whole argument seems to me, as a Christian, rather fruitless. Here is why evangelical Christians will never accept gay marriage: The Bible says that homosexual behavior is sinful. Research Paper Proposal? Period. It doesn’t matter what stats are brought up, and it doesn’t matter about biology. The only way you can convince an evangelical/Bible believing Christian to ever vote against Prop 8 is to make them take the Bible less seriously. Conversely, I seriously doubt that statistics are going to Love questions, convince a homosexual that he or she is an unfit parent b/c some homosexuals are promiscuous or mean or whatever.

I’m not going to stop pursuing adoption b/c some other “Christian” beats their children. That’s ridiculous. The problem here for anti-Prop 8 folks is Nursing paper introduction not stats; it’s the Love essay Bible. Homosexual sex, just like heterosexual sex outside of marriage, is sinful. The only way you can convince an evangelical/Bible believing Christian to ever vote against Prop 8 is to make them take the research paper introduction Bible less seriously. The Bible does not require a scorched earth, take no prisoners jihad against Uf admission essay building, all secular law.

Don’t believe in gay marriage, don’t get gay married. Reject membership in any Church that has gay marriage. Paper Introduction? Tell gay married friends that you think they are making a major mistake with their lives. If they are convinced by your arguments, great. If not you leave them alone. This is what Catholics who take the church’s doctrine on divorce seriously. Just so you know, you’ve erected a straw man with you theodicy problem or the Bible’s wrong canard.

The doctrine of Love essay questions, original sin answers why someone’s sexual orientation can be perverted even from Nursing paper, birth, and someone’s choice to act on a sinful impulse is no excuse. Just because someone may like to steal…alot…is no excuse for them to pillage the village. No, I didn’t erect a strawman. This is very much a theodicy problem. How do you vindicate divine goodness and providence in light of the fact that God specifically created homosexuals, who have utterly no choice in the matter, then went on Help xavier to direct people to kill those caught engaging in homosexual acts? This goes well beyond the doctrine of original sin. Your analogy to theft is faulty. Until, that is, you can demonstrate how homosexuality breaks your leg or picks your pocket. Put it another way, other than on account of the Bible says so, why is homosexuality immoral?

I don’t believe that publicly funded adoption services do place homosexual couples below heterosexual couples. Actually, they do. Every adoption agency I have ever heard of does extensive background checks, and research paper puts M-F married couples at the top of the list (all other things being equal; clearly, there could be issues rendering some couples relatively unfit). Catholic affiliated adoption services certainly do not place children with homosexual couples. Not anymore, but they have. The Catholic Charities closed its adoption program in Massachusetts not because of the state’s gay marriage law but because of an existing gay anti-discrimination law. In fact, the charity had voluntarily placed older foster children in Dissertation review, gay and lesbian households — the most willing to research introduction, take hard-to-place children — until the church hierarchy was alerted and demanded that adoptions conform to the church’s religious teaching, which was in conflict with state law. Raising once again the question: is it better that children grow up in questions, foster care, or be adopted by research a gay couple? Neither your opinion, nor mine matters here.

There is an objective truth out there, what is review service it? To pick a nit with your statement… homosexual practice is not a mating practice. Strictly speaking it is, because it is the result of the drive to mate. Putting little or no thought into Nursing proposal, it does not make it any less a choice than a well thought out decision. Is your heterosexuality a choice? Could you decide to engage in with, homosexuality? I’m going to go out on a limb here: No, and No.

You are denying to others that which you assume for yourself. Here is why evangelical Christians will never accept gay marriage: The Bible says that homosexual behavior is sinful. Period. That amounts to the good German defense. Paper Introduction Proposal? (See the Euthyphros dilemma, above). Thanks for essay the info . Paper Introduction Proposal? . Essay? . The Bible does not require a scorched earth, take no prisoners jihad against Nursing research introduction proposal, all secular law. Certainly not, but we still get a vote. And if we think a practice is evil, then we can vote no (or yes, as the university case may be.) In this case, I think homosexual sex is Nursing introduction not only Love essay evil, I think calling the union of two homosexuals ‘marriage’ is absurd. The Bible says it is Nursing research introduction wickedness in no uncertain terms.

What else can I say? Now my reply is being held up … You’re not being asked to vote on whether or not you think gay sex is evil or not anymore than you are asked to vote on whether people who marry for money rather than love are evil or whether it’s evil to ditch your wife after she gets disfigured in Uf admission essay, a car accident…. There are plenty of things that one thinks are evil that are nonetheless legal and it doesn’t follow that just being evil is sufficient to justify making it illegal. Just so you know, you’ve erected a straw man with you theodicy problem or the research paper proposal Bible’s wrong canard. Dissertation Review? The doctrine of original sin answers why someone’s orientation can be perverted even from birth, and someone’s choice to act on a sinful impulse is no excuse. Just because someone may like to steal…alot…is no excuse for research paper them to Challenges when writing, pillage the village. No, I didn’t erect a strawman. This is very much a theodicy problem. How do you vindicate divine goodness and providence in paper introduction, light of the essay building fact that God specifically created homos*xuals, who have utterly no choice in the matter, then went on Nursing research paper proposal to direct people to kill those caught engaging in homos*xual acts? This goes well beyond the doctrine of original sin.

Your analogy to theft is faulty. Until, that is, you can demonstrate how someone else’s being gay breaks your leg or picks your pocket. Put it another way, other than on account of the Bible says so, why is review being gay immoral? I don’t believe that publicly funded adoption services do place homos*xual couples below heteros*xual couples. Actually, they do. Every adoption agency I have ever heard of Nursing research proposal, does extensive background checks, and questions puts M-F married couples at Nursing research paper introduction, the top of the list (all other things being equal; clearly, there could be issues rendering some couples relatively unfit). Catholic affiliated adoption services certainly do not place children with same gender couples.

Not anymore, but they have. The Catholic Charities closed its adoption program in Massachusetts not because of the essay state’s gay marriage law but because of an existing gay anti-discrimination law. In fact, the paper charity had voluntarily placed older foster children in gay and lesbian households — the most willing to take hard-to-place children — until the church hierarchy was alerted and with phd proposal xavier demanded that adoptions conform to the church’s religious teaching, which was in Nursing paper introduction proposal, conflict with state law. Raising once again the question: is it better that children grow up in foster care, or be adopted by a gay couple? Neither your opinion, nor mine matters here. There is an objective truth out there, what is it? To pick a nit with your statement… homos*xual practice is not a mating practice. Strictly speaking it is, because it is the result of the essay drive to mate. Putting little or no thought into it does not make it any less a choice than a well thought out Nursing research introduction, decision. Is your being straight a choice?

Could you decide to become gay, even for a day? I’m going to go out on a limb here: No, and questions No. You are denying to others that which you assume for yourself. Here is why evangelical Christians will never accept gay marriage: The Bible says that gay behavior is sinful. Paper Introduction? Period. That amounts to the good German defense. Justification? (See the Euthyphros dilemma, above). Yes, you did erect a strawman. Presumably, you are arguing against someone like myself. Paper Introduction Proposal? I believe that men are inherently sinful b/c we fell in Adam.

God is review service delivery not obligated to rescue us from sin of any kind: homos*xual s*x is just one of Nursing introduction proposal, those. It’s no problem of “theodicy” because we are all guilty of sin. It goes like this: God created man good. Man sinned and became sinful. God is under no obligation to rectify this (even though He has for essay building all who believe in Jesus.) People perish, Skipper, because they refuse to believe the truth of God in Jesus Christ. Nursing Research Paper Introduction? Do you want to when, escape the wrath to come?

Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved. If you don’t believe and Nursing research you perish, don’t blame God. Put it another way, other than on Uf admission essay building account of the Bible says so, why is being gay immoral? The Bible gives us truth. I read this as saying, “Other than on Nursing paper introduction proposal account of it being true that homosexuality is immoral, why is being gay immoral?” What I think and you think is irrelevant if the Bible is true.

Why should I leave the paper service Bible as true for Nursing research paper introduction someone else’s stats and pontifications? That amounts to the good German defense. Does this look like German to you?: “Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the writing service kingdom of Nursing research introduction proposal, God” (1 Cor. 6:9). Besides, Thomas Aquinas and others have dealt with the supposed Euthyphros dilemma before. Services Do And Don Ts? He also found it to be a false dilemma. Here’s one example I took from the “Stand to Reason” site: An objective standard exists (this avoids the first horn of the dilemma). However, the standard is paper introduction not external to Biology paper writing voucher, God, but internal (avoiding the second horn). Morality is grounded in the immutable character of introduction proposal, God, who is perfectly good. His commands are not whims, but rooted in Uf admission essay building, His holiness.

My point in all this is that you will never win a Bible believing Christian to your view. Conversely, I don’t know why anyone would be persuaded of the Biblical view unless they have already submitted to the Lordship of Jesus Christ. Is your being straight a choice? Could you decide to become gay, even for a day? I’m going to go out on a limb here: No, and No. That was indeed going out on a limb, and paper the limb wasn’t even there to paper voucher, go out Nursing paper introduction proposal, on. Yes, my personal s-exuality is a choice. Dissertation? If I chose to practice homos-exuality, I could. In fact, the charity had voluntarily placed older foster children in gay and lesbian households — the most willing to take hard-to-place children — until the paper introduction proposal church hierarchy was alerted and demanded that adoptions conform to the church’s religious teaching, which was in conflict with state law. Let me translate this for you since you have erred. Help With Phd Proposal University? Some individuals within the agency went against Church doctrine to place those children in homos-exual settings.

It was NOT agency policy to be non-conforming to Church teaching. When the Church heirarchy found out about it, the people that erred in conformance were told to conform. In other words, if your employer has a policy that none of the workers smokes at work and you sneakily do so, does that mean that your employer’s policy allows workers to smoke at work? Strictly speaking it is, because it is the result of the drive to mate. No, it is borne of Nursing introduction, a desire to self-pleasure. I THINK SAYIN YES TO PROP 8 IS HORRIBLE… I WOULD HAVE VOTED NO BUT IAM ONLY 17 YRS OLD.. I THINK PEOPLE SHOULD MARRY PEOPLE WHO THE LOVE. THERE IS NO RIGHT TO TAKE THAT AWAY FROM CURTIAN PEOPLE.. WHAT IF THEY SAID NOBODY CANT MARRY THE LOVE OF THEIR LIVES..

ITS NOT RIGHT.. IT DOSENT MATTER WHO U MARRY OR WHAT COLOR OR RACE.. EVERYONE SHOULD GET THE SAME RIGHT AS EVERYONE IN THE WORLD.. ITS NOT EVEN PEOPLES BUISNESS WHO PEOPLE MARRY ANYWAYZ.. NO ONE SHOULD BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY.. VOTING YES TO ME IS BULLS**T.. THIS IS MY OPINION.. Uf Admission Essay? AND I STICK WITH IT.. EVEN IN THE CONSTITUTION SAYS PEOPLE SHOULD BE TREATED THE SAME..

SO UR GOIN AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION.. I THINK SAYIN YES TO PROP 8 IS HORRIBLE… I WOULD HAVE VOTED NO BUT IAM ONLY 17 YRS OLD.. I THINK PEOPLE SHOULD MARRY PEOPLE WHO THE LOVE. THERE IS NO RIGHT TO TAKE THAT AWAY FROM CURTIAN PEOPLE.. Nursing Research? WHAT IF THEY SAID NOBODY CANT MARRY THE LOVE OF THEIR LIVES.. Challenges When Writing? ITS NOT RIGHT.. IT DOSENT MATTER WHO U MARRY OR WHAT COLOR OR RACE.. EVERYONE SHOULD GET THE SAME RIGHT AS EVERYONE IN THE WORLD..

ITS NOT EVEN PEOPLES BUISNESS WHO PEOPLE MARRY ANYWAYZ.. NO ONE SHOULD BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY.. VOTING YES TO ME IS BULLS**T.. THIS IS MY OPINION.. AND I STICK WITH IT.. EVEN IN THE CONSTITUTION SAYS PEOPLE SHOULD BE TREATED THE SAME.. SO UR GOIN AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION..

SMMTheory – Having gay sex does not make you gay. WANTING to have gay sex makes you gay. A gay person COULD sleep with a woman just as you COULD sleep with a man. Research? But it wouldn’t make him straight or you gay. What makes a person gay is their personal desires and College essay do and inner thoughts, not their actions. Research Paper Proposal? And these are things obviously beyond our control. SMMTheory – And how did you arrive at the conclusion that homosexuality is about self-pleasuring? Has it ever occured to you that gay people fall in love? They are human beings too.

With regard to strawmen, you are evading the point at don ts, hand. The theodicy problem here is squaring God’s goodness and providence with God specifically creating people whose mating preference is for those of their own gender, then specifically commanding people to kill them (Lev 20:13 — well, men anyway) when acting upon the drive God uniquely gave them, then declared sinful in all its manifestations. This goes beyond problematic human nature (ignoring for Nursing paper introduction proposal the moment how God could have created men good and questions sinful at the same time) by placing a unique curse on a few people. Of course God does under no obligation to paper proposal, rectify that which God has caused. However, that is no advertisement for God’s goodness and essay building providence. Hence, the unique theodicy problem: specifically creating a special kind of sinfulness, then directing people to kill when it occurs. Does this look like German to you? Your citation of 1 Cor 6:9 is to assume the Nursing research paper introduction Good German defense. The inhabitants of Love questions, that list are uniquely condemned, and you agree without questioning at Nursing paper, all why.

Among the infractions listed, homos-xuality is unique in Uf admission building, that, in and of itself, it picks no one’s pocket, nor breaks anyone’s leg. The moment you accept something as so purely by Nursing research introduction argument from authority, you have adopted the Good German defense. Beyond that, though, who does that list omit? Anyone? You? I seem to remember Jesus saying something to the effect that sexually immoral thinking is Challenges when just as bad as act itself. Consequently, all you have managed to Nursing paper proposal, conclude here is that homos-xuals are just as, but no more, condemned than the rest of us. Besides, Thomas Aquinas and others have dealt with the supposed Euthyphros dilemma before. He also found it to be a false dilemma. Here’s one example I took from the “Stand to Reason” site: “An objective standard exists (this avoids the first horn of the dilemma).

However, the Challenges a paper standard is not external to God, but internal (avoiding the second horn). Morality is grounded in Nursing proposal, the immutable character of God, who is perfectly good. His commands are not whims, but rooted in His holiness.” The trouble with this being that once the theological debris is review service delivery cleared and you understand what it is they’re getting at, you find yourself right back at the first horn. Research? If goodness is part of God’s nature, then goodness is not something God has any control over, and divine command theory is incorrect. That was indeed going out on a limb, and the limb wasn’t even there to go out on. Yes, my personal s-exuality is a choice. If I chose to practice homos-exuality, I could.

That is an empty assertion. You could choose to dress a pig in a tutu and paint it green. But since you never would actually make that choice, making that statement is no better than attempting to assert a null. Let me translate this for you since you have erred. Essay Building? Some individuals within the agency went against Church doctrine to place those children in homos-exual settings. Paper Introduction? It was NOT agency policy to be non-conforming to Help phd proposal xavier university, Church teaching. I didn’t err — it actually happened; whether it accorded with Church doctrine is research paper introduction proposal a separate matter.

However, it is worth bringing up in its own right, because it reiterates a question I have raised before, but you have avoided. Which is Biology worse, having same-s*x couples adopt a child, or that child being raised in foster homes? If the latter (and I strongly suspect that is true), then Church doctrine amounts to enforcing a choice detrimental to the children for Nursing research proposal whom the ideal choice does not exist. I’m glad I don’t have to defend that position. Strictly speaking it is, because it is the result of the drive to paper writing service, mate. No, it is borne of a desire to self-pleasure. No more than heteros-xuality is. Nursing Research? That the coupling can’t result in offspring doesn’t mean the desire to couple doesn’t have the same basis.

IMHO, gays should have simply left well enough alone for another ten years. By which time nearly everyone will view this kerfuffle through the same lens we now view, say, miscegenation: what the heck were they thinking? In the meantime, there is nothing to be gained by annoying those whose religious precepts still make it moral to building, ostracize an entire group of people simply for the way they were born, for Nursing introduction doing something that causes no one else any harm. What portion of the Help with xavier university population was conceived out of a motive for self-pleasure versus a purposeful motive of paper introduction proposal, mating? Well, you partially got my point concerning human nature. Justification? I’m not going to go over the supposed two horns of the dilemma you presented though. It has been satisfactorily answered for a few hundred years now. Your “Good German” argument is precisely my point, except we’re not “Good Germans,” we’re “Good Evangelicals.” (Some of whom happen to be good Germans.) All Bible-believing Christians appeal to the Bible for their final authority.

We believe it to be an infallible source of truth. Did you not know that? We have a host of reasons for believing this to be true, and you have probably heard them before and paper introduction we’d stray from the point if we want there. So if your point is that I’ve believed that homosexuality is immoral simply b/c I read it in the Bible and accept it as authoritative, I’m willing to Love questions, concede that. There are other reasons for believing this to be so, but that, in the end, is why evangelicals vote “Yes” to Nursing research introduction proposal, Prop 8. Everyone, ultimately, accepts an argument from authority. I do not accept the authority of Scripture uncritcally, there are reasons.

But I’ve tipped my hand for College essay services you and Nursing paper proposal shown you my cards. you know my source of authority. But it’s not enough for university you to Nursing research introduction proposal, smell my rotten egg; you’ve got to lay your own. Help Xavier? What is Nursing paper introduction your authority? Man’s reason? Here’s the best part of College services don ts, what you said: Your citation of 1 Cor 6:9 is to assume the Nursing paper proposal Good German defense. The inhabitants of that list are uniquely condemned, and you agree without questioning at all why. Phd Proposal Xavier? Among the infractions listed, homos-xuality is unique in that, in and of itself, it picks no one’s pocket, nor breaks anyone’s leg. Beyond that, though, who does that list omit? Anyone?

You? I seem to paper proposal, remember Jesus saying something to essay building, the effect that sexually immoral thinking is just as bad as act itself. I apologize if I wasn’t clear before, and though I’d be happy to talk about Nursing research paper, it, I’m not interested in this forum in outlining all the ways in which homosexuality is harmful to those who practice it and for xavier those who approve of it. My answers are Biblical anyway, and Nursing research paper as I said before, I would not expect anyone to believe them if they haven’t first submitted to Love, the Lordship of proposal, Jesus Christ anyway. But you are right.

1 Cor. Writing A Paper Justification? 6:9 condemns all sorts of people in this passage. And Jesus did say that even calling your brother a “fool” puts one in danger of hellfire. Nursing Paper Introduction? So yeah, you’re right about Jesus being strict on sins other than those that pick my pocket and break my leg. So I whole-heartedly agree with this statement you made, and Dissertation I applaud it: Consequently, all you have managed to conclude here is that homos-xuals are just as, but no more, condemned than the rest of Nursing introduction proposal, us. There is hope for sinners in the resurrected Jesus Christ. Swindlers, fornicators et al. That’s where I always want to questions, wind up in the conversation. Before someone can see Christ Jesus as the only hope, they need to be aware of the reason that they need a hope, and pretending that certain things that are sinful and evil are actually good and Nursing paper approved will have the result of letting them continue to with university, perdition without warning. Our real disagreement, the root of our disagreement, does not revolve around statistics and love and sexual inclination.

It revolves around what you and I believe about Jesus Christ and whether or not the Bible is research paper introduction true. A Paper? Right? We believe [the Bible] to be an infallible source of truth. That is the problem. It is not infallible (Thou shalt not kill, thall shalt kill gays caught in the act). And, while it may be a source of truth, that does not mean everything in it is true. The problem Evangelicals are faced with here is asserting homos-xuality is ipso facto immoral, because the Bible says so. No doubt, it clearly does. However, as I mentioned above, the notion of morality applies only to the extent there is free will. Because of this, among the Nursing paper very few who still insist being gay is a matter of choice, Evangelicals are prominent. College Services Do And Don Ts? Yield on the matter of introduction, choice, then the whole question of morality starts looking irrelevant.

Worse, it provokes the theodicy problem that you have pretty much ignored. Theodicy, in College services, its simple form, attempts to vindicate divine goodness and providence in the view of the Nursing research paper existence of Dissertation, evil. That really isn’t particularly difficult: humans would not be humans without free will; free will entails evil. However, that question gets much harder to deal with when acknowledging that God specifically created a subset of people who, having no choice in the matter, were going to be the target of God-directed ostracism, opprobrium, and murder. People whose humanity, by the way, makes them as dependent upon mental and physical affection as you are. Of course, God can do anything God wants. But, if the words “goodness” and “providence” are to have any meaning whatsoever, then creating gays presents a glaring contradiction. That contradiction can only be resolved by Nursing proposal giving up on theodicy, or concluding that, in the case, the Bible is wrong: being gay is not immoral, and morality of acting on that impulse is contained wholly within context: monogamous homos-xuality is no more immoral than monogamous heteros-xuality. Yielding that, however, admits that the Bible is a paper justification not an infallible source of truth; rather, it contains assertions that are presented as true, but are, in fact, morally indefensible. What is your authority? Man’s reason?

Well, yes. Introduction? Words have meanings. In order for an action to be immoral, the actor must have a meaningful choice, the action cannot be imposed upon someone else, and the action cannot significantly impose upon those not parties to Dissertation review delivery, the act. By all these measures, homos-xuality is no more immoral than heteros-xuality, because neither, absent context, has any moral content whatsoever. In other words, on this score, the Bible’s assertions are simply wrong. Whoever wrote those words was operating under a fundamental misapprehension, and falling prey to one of the research paper proposal most pernicious elements of human nature: the desire to demonize those who are different. I’m not interested in this forum in outlining all the ways in which homosexuality is essay harmful to those who practice it and for those who approve of it. Well, perhaps you should be. The alternative is to insist upon the immorality of a group of people while leaving on Nursing paper introduction the table precisely why they are immoral.

To the extent your answers are Biblical, the insistence upon making secular marriage unavailable to do and don ts, gays crumbles. There is Nursing introduction proposal hope for sinners in the resurrected Jesus Christ. Swindlers, fornicators et al. So, what happens to a monogamous gay couple who accepts Jesus as their savior? Are they uniquely condemned, as opposed to everyone else who accepts Jesus? If not, and phd proposal university I see no Biblical reason to conclude otherwise, then your citation of this passage doesn’t seem particularly relevant to the matter at paper proposal, hand. Our real disagreement, the root of our disagreement, does not revolve around statistics and College essay do and don ts love and sexual inclination. It revolves around what you and Nursing paper introduction I believe about Jesus Christ and Help with phd proposal xavier whether or not the Nursing research paper proposal Bible is true.

Right? Full disclosure: I am an agnostic areligionist. (Agnostic, because I think the question of whether a supreme being exists is unanswerable; areligionist because I think all religions are man made out of building, whole cloth). Now, that doesn’t mean that I would necessarily disagree with the paper introduction proposal conclusions of a scripturally based argument, regardless of how I think the Bible came to be. In this case, though, Evangelicals have arrived at a conclusion I believe to Love essay questions, be profoundly immoral. Nursing Research Paper Introduction Proposal? That is what this revolves around. That is the problem. It is not infallible. Well there you go! Is that an argument from Love essay questions, authority, btw? I’ll give you mine, “Yes, it is!”

In this case, though, Evangelicals have arrived at a conclusion I believe to be profoundly immoral. That is what this revolves around. In other words, “Evangelicals have believed the Nursing research introduction proposal Bible, which I believe is profoundly immoral in regards to how it views homosexuality.” In another thread, Boonton mentioned that he believed himself to be an above average guy who is right about Biology paper writing, 54% of the time. I agree that he is both intelligent and Nursing paper proposal probably right more than he is wrong. So, why should I trade the Bible that is 100% right for genius that is right only 60% or so? The Bible is 100% accurate, is it? May I ask – which version?

To name just a handful of the modern translations, there is the King James Version, the New King James Version, the Revised Standard Version, the New International Version, and the New American Standard Version. When we look back further through history, translations which are presumably closer to the original, we find, among others, the Codex Sinaiticus, the Codex Vaticanus and the Old Latin Vulgate. Obviously these are just a scant few of the more well known versions, and there are many, many more. And here’s the point – they all say different things. In most cases, the differences seem hugely insignificant, but the more distantly related the versions are, the more differences become apparent. They cannot ALL be correct.

So if you have miraculous insight into which particular version is THE authoratative version of the Bible (since they cannot all be true), then please do enlighten us. Thou shalt not kill. Thou shalt kill. It is worth noting here that any system of statements containing a contradiction may be used to prove any conclusion, no matter how absurd. That contradiction, taken from a couple Biblical passages, holes your claim to infallibility below the waterline. So, why should I trade the College services don ts Bible that is 100% right for genius that is right only 60% or so? Every time religion has ostracized entire groups of people it has been wrong.

Think of the Reformation, or assigning to Jews the collective guilt of deicide. Your position really boils down to “on account of because.” You sidestep Euthyphros with a transparent dodge, and research paper introduction proposal fail to so much as take on board the theodicy problem. Yet you (and, I presume, all) Evangelicals seek to impose a sectarian beliefs upon a form of secular contract. That is ironic enough. The irony meter goes into the red, though, on service noting that there is no barrier whatsoever to other sects performing sacred marriage upon whomever they choose. So, in the realm where Evangelicals really should have to justify themselves with something more than “on account of because” they don’t. And, in the realm where Biblical inerrancy should make dissension on this matter non existent, it doesn’t. Within ten years, people are going to look back on the passage of Nursing paper introduction, Prop 8 with this one question: what the heck were they thinking?

Richie asks what is “THE authoritative version . . Essay Questions? .? Good question! THE answer is the Authorized Version, which is the only version without a copyright. It has been said, you can’t copywrite the Word of God. The two ms. that you mentioned (Sinaticus and Vaticanus), not only Nursing paper proposal disagreed between themselves, but with 95% of the extant Greek ms. in paper service, existence. They formed the Nursing paper introduction proposal basis of most of the modern translations. (Even the when infamous “New World Translation” used the Wescott-Hort Greek). Of these two ms., one was found in a trash can and the other in the Vatican Library. Both were of highly questionable value, besides their presumed antiquity.

There is no such thing as a perfect translation, but the Greek ms. upon which the paper introduction proposal English translation is justification made is essential to its accuracy. Check out “The Revision Revised” by John Burgon. for an eye opener. Richie asks, what is THE authoritative version . . .?” The answer is THE Authorised Version. Since the paper introduction beginning of recorded history there has never been same sex marriage`allowed in any culture, at any time. But according to Skipper, in Biology paper writing service, 10 years time everyone will asking “what the research paper introduction heck were we thinking” in refusing Prop 8? qwertyuio – I have to say it’s nice to College services don ts, be given a straight answer.

However, things are not really so simple. For example, you cannot simply discount Sinaticus and Vaticanus simply because they disagree with most of the Nursing research paper proposal Greek manuscripts. Imagine for a moment there is a book (Book 1). I make two copies of that book (Books 2 and 3), but in one copy (Book 3)I accidentally make an error. If the flawed copy is then taken and copied, then the Dissertation service new copy (Book 4) will also contain that flaw. Simply put, if Book 3 is taken and copied hundreds of times while Books 1 and 2 are not, then those two books will end up disagreeing with the vast majority of texts, but that is Nursing research obviously not good grounds to dismiss them. When we look at the earliest Greek manuscripts of the New Testament, the Help phd proposal xavier first problem is of course, that we do not have the originals for any of the Nursing paper introduction proposal New Testament books. The earliest copiest we have for the books date from between roughly 100 and 300 AD, and exist mostly in fragments.

The Codex Vaticanus is the Help with phd proposal earliest of the paper introduction great parchment manuscripts at Uf admission, 300 AD. Now also consider that in this time there was no printing press, so everything had to be copied by hand in a time and society were very few were literate at all. This explains why the earliest manuscripts vary the most. The Authorized Version was written in the 17th century using existing English translations, but comparing them to the ancient Greek texts. It is therefore hugely important WHICH Greek texts they used, since they vary so much. How do we know they selected the right ones, if indeed, the ‘right ones’ have even survived? But all this history aside, interesting as it is, even the Authorized version contains contradictions.

To pull one at random, how did Judas Iscariot die? According to proposal, Matthew 27:3-8, he gave his silver to College essay services, the priests, who used it to buy the Field of Nursing proposal, Blood – called so because they buried foreigners there, and then hanged himself. According to Acts 1:18-19, Judas himself bought the field and ‘fell headlong’ onto it so his guts burst out phd proposal, (nice), and this gave the field its name. How can the 100% accurate word of God contain such a blatant contradiction? Since the beginning of recorded history there has never been same sex marriage`allowed in paper introduction, any culture, at any time.

But according to Skipper, in Challenges writing a paper, 10 years time everyone will asking “what the heck were we thinking” in refusing Prop 8? Yep. Both demographics and people’s experience point in that direction. Younger people increasingly accept the Nursing research paper proposal obvious, that homos-xuality is innate, not chosen. Also, familiarity has failed to breed contempt. As gays have come out when a paper justification, of the closet, everyone else increasingly sees them as people, rather than contemptible perverts. So, I think it not only Nursing research paper introduction inevitable, but sooner rather than later that society will look at Prop 8 as a bloody minded denial of a minority by a majority for whom the cost would have been nil. All based upon nothing more than “on account of Because.” What would have been your reaction in 1998 if someone was to insist that in 2008, a black man with the last name Obama would be elected president?

A thread on same sex marriage is not the place to go into too much detail on this matter. But I will say this and College leave it to rest. Personally, I don’t care whether you believe me or not. If you are sincere in wanting to know more, I suggest that you google Wilber Pickering from the Greek department of paper introduction, Dallas Theological Seminary (Try Pickering + KJV),or (David Fuller + KJV),or John Burgon + KJV). Do some research! The Authorized Version was written using Greek, (NOT English)texts as a base.

It was in agreement with no less than 95% of the 5000 existing Greek ms. Writing A Paper Justification? These copies and fragments do not vary much and one could reconstruct the entire NT (except for a few verses) just by personal corresponsense letters of the church fathers. On the other hand the introduction proposal Sinaticus and Vaticanus deviate over 3000 times from the “Majority Text” and leave out 200 verses found in the Authorized version. They were horrible texts and were not used, or replicated, for Biology paper writing service the very reason that they were horrible. Concerning the alledged contradiction of Nursing research paper, Judas’ death as described in the book of Matthew and Acts. Matthew says he hanged himself. Luke says that he fell headlong into a field and his guts burst out. In order for the latter to happen, he must have fallen from a distance, which logically could have occured when he hung himself.

He botched everything else in life, why not his own death? Why “headlong”? No one knows, perhaps he got caught up in the branches of the tree that he hung himself on. I believe the Word of God. Services Do And? When 90% can be proven true, I can accept the other 10% on faith. That is my last word on paper introduction this subject. . . qwertyu7, you are right that this is a little off-topic, but I had to answer the Uf admission building accusations against me.

I have indeed done some research. My understanding of the English origins of the Nursing paper proposal Auhorized version comes from http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02141a.htm. Be that as it may, your understanding of the Biblical scholarship is obviously lacking. Our earliest fragments of the books that make up the Bible differ hugely. It was only College don ts with the invention of the printing press that any book could be reliably reproduced. Paper Proposal? The Sinaticus and College essay services do and Vaticanus are not freak versions which deviate thousands of times – ALL early Bible manuscripts differ; sometimes significantly, though mostly not. There is research paper introduction no consensus or “majority text”. For a fuller explaination, see Bart Erhman’s Misquoting Jesus, or http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=vJluEnIqTVk. Finally, what is the 90% of the Bible that can be proven true? None of xavier, it can be.

You are taking the Bible ENTIRELY on faith as being even 90% true. For more on the historical inaccuracies in the Bible, see http://www.ebonmusings.org/atheism/otarch.html. I do see we are going off on a tangent though. Nursing Research? I just had to speak out at the accusations that I had failed to research these matters, or that the Bible can be proved to be in College, the slightest bit accurate. 1. No accusations were made against you. 2. You are right The total number of departures of Nursing paper, “the Sinaticus and Vaticanus are not freak versions that deviate thousands of services, times.” To be more precise these versions deviate over paper proposal 36,000 times from the university Majority Text.

3.The majority of the 5000 Greek ms. Introduction Proposal? are in agreement. That is writing a paper justification why the paper proposal Majority Text is Love also called the “Received Text.” It is essentially what was recieved by the early church fathers. 4.You say that “there is paper introduction no consensus, or Majority Text.” If you google “Majority Text” you will find 86,000,000 references. 5.You say that “none” of the Bible can be proven true. When Writing? B.J. Chesterton one of the world’s formost Mideast archeologists said that he has never found one thing in his archeological research that has ever contradicted a New Testiment statement. And he was a Jew! 5. You express doubt that the Bible is the “slightest bit accurate.” The year is research introduction proposal 2008 . . . since when? If I do not respond to your reply it is because. I am undergoing a family crisis, and besides, I don’t want to hijack this thread. 1. Uf Admission? Perhaps I spoke a little strongly there.

I meant no offence. 2, 3 #038; 4. I stand totally corrected. Paper Introduction Proposal? There IS a “majority text”. You learn something new every day. However, according to the first site I visited, ‘The “Majority Text” is a statistical construct that does not correspond exactly to essay, any known manuscript. It is arrived at by comparing all known manuscripts with one another and deriving from introduction, them the readings that are more numerous than any others.’ In other words, no single manuscript actually fits this ‘majority text’. It has been formed by when a paper looking at all the Bibe versions and fragments, (all of which disagree in one place or another) and in research introduction proposal, each case, favouring the most numerous interpretation. However, as I think I demonstrated in comment 98, the most numerous account is not necessarily the most accurate.

If I make two copies of a book and one copy contains a mistake, but the flawed copy simply goes on to be copied more times, then this will be the most numerous version, and therefore the one to appear in review service, the Majority Text. Paper Proposal? The Majority Text is doubtless an interesting focal point in Biblical scholarship, but there is no reason to when writing justification, suppose that this is more reliable or accurate than any other version. 5. ‘Not finding anything to contradict’ is not the same as proving. It’s like asking someone to prove a negative. Nursing Paper? If I said Oliver Twist was true and I could find no evidence in London to contradict this claim, that is a far cry from saying I have proved it to Biology paper writing service, be true. Indeed the most convincing argument against the inerrancy of the Bible is the research lack of Uf admission building, evidence that we would expect to find if it was all true. for good examples of research introduction, this. 6. ‘2008 years since the birth of Jesus’, is the answer you are obviously fishing for. However, the BC/AD dating system was not invented until 525 AD, and was only slowly adopted in Dissertation review service, the West between the 8th and 14th centuries.

The entire dating system was drawn up by men who were deeply Christian, and introduction proposal centuries after Jesus supposedly lived. This obviously cannot constitute strong evidence for Jesus’ existence or Biblical accuracy. As a final point, I am sincerely sorry if you are having any personal troubles. I hope it is all sorted out soon. I won’t take it badly at all if you don’t respond. But I’m always happy to debate it you do. Actually, a study done a couple of years ago found that whether or not couples were in a legal commitment was the Challenges writing a paper factor in staying together, rather than sexual orientation. Unmarried same sex couples did not (if I remember correctly) break up at a greater rate than unmarried heterosexual couples. And frankly, if heterosexual couples don’t need any incentive to stay monogamous without a marriage, well, why do they bother marrying?

It sounds to me as if you’ve just argued that people can be just as committed living together as they are married. I only agree with like 2-things in Nursing introduction, here…But seriously, why take away a persons civil rights? That’s just so wrong! I mean really when all these church people and white trash gay bashers move in and try to take away their rights, it doesn’t make you look like you’re “proteacting” or “saving” marriage, it just looks like you’re being a whiney little bitch about it… I only essay building agree with like 2-things in here…But seriously, why take away a persons civil rights? That’s just so wrong! I mean really when all these church people and white trash gay bashers move in introduction, and try to take away their rights, it doesn’t make you look like you’re “proteacting” or “saving” marriage, it just looks like you’re being a whiney little bitch about it… I agree with you that there are other considerations about essay do and, this issue than biblical ones. You mentioned some cultural ones, there are judicial /legal ones as well. (Is this right actually in the Calif constitution, despite what the Nursing research paper Supreme Court says?) This is not a Christian issue.

It’s about democratic majority rule, what rights are given to Love, the minority and how to properly protect those rights. See my blog, “Life in the Big Democracy” at http://www.sophiesladder.com. P.S. Nursing Research? I found this blog from a link on “Blue Christian”. rbmhw sawicuv pmcthf rynhet gnljb bahez gfnjmtcy. rbmhw sawicuv pmcthf rynhet gnljb bahez gfnjmtcy. rbmhw sawicuv pmcthf rynhet gnljb bahez gfnjmtcy. i personall do not support gay marrige….here are a few reasons why.

2.how will this going to benefit the university society….instead this will ruin the proposal society. 3.legalizing gay marriage would open the doors to any body getting married, for example would you want your dog to get married to another dog of the same sex…..how is the with phd proposal dog going to be benefited?? 4.why is there this change. …its not like divorce is not legal…i mean two people of the same sex can be good friends….how are they going to Nursing research, benefit the world….they can go out and watch movies or hand out together… 5.this is less meaningful to the society. 6.there is Love questions a need of a family…you cant just adopt children from the orphanage…..one day the orphanage will run out of Nursing research introduction proposal, babies, then who will produces more babies or the orphanage would not want to when writing a paper justification, give the baby to a gay couple…will they??

7.gay parents will raise their children to be a gay…influation… 8. Research Introduction Proposal? gay marriage is not supported by religion. 9.children would not succeed if they do not have a male parent and a female parent. 10.this will change the foundation of society…i mean this is not what humans are…. now i am in a huge mess, personally this is what i think of gay marriage, and now i have been given my debate topic to be for Help xavier gay marraige and i don’t even agree to one of the advantages of gay marriage…i have not even lost one debate in my life….all i can do is more research, if any one you have a strong point for gay marriage pls do tell me… i personall do not support gay marrige….here are a few reasons why. 2.how will this going to benefit the society….instead this will ruin the society. 3.legalizing gay marriage would open the doors to research proposal, any body getting married, for example would you want your dog to questions, get married to Nursing research introduction, another dog of the voucher same sex…..how is the proposal dog going to be benefited?? 4.why is there this change. Building? …its not like divorce is not legal…i mean two people of the same sex can be good friends….how are they going to benefit the world….they can go out and watch movies or hand out Nursing paper introduction, together… 5.this is essay questions less meaningful to Nursing research paper proposal, the society. 6.there is a need of a family…you cant just adopt children from the orphanage…..one day the orphanage will run out of babies, then who will produces more babies or the orphanage would not want to give the Love essay questions baby to a gay couple…will they?? 7.gay parents will raise their children to be a gay…influation…

8. gay marriage is not supported by religion. 9.children would not succeed if they do not have a male parent and research paper a female parent. 10.this will change the foundation of society…i mean this is not what humans are…. now i am in a huge mess, personally this is what i think of gay marriage, and service voucher now i have been given my debate topic to be FOR gay marraige and introduction proposal i don’t even agree to one of the advantages of Challenges writing a paper, gay marriage…i have not even lost one debate in my life….all i can do is more research, if any one you have a strong point for gay marriage pls do tell me… Don’t let this important debate die. Everyone who’s posted here has raised some very good points, and they should be preserved for anyone in the future who needs to learn the Nursing research paper proposal arguments on both sides. With Xavier? The best place to do that is at Nursing research, http://www.livingvote.org/. ‘Christians’ appear graceless, judgmental and controlling when they vote to ‘defend marriage’.

The statistics offered by Steeve were an utter joke. Mr Hollis’ rebuttal was very impressive.

Jan 27, 2018 Nursing research paper introduction proposal, write my paper for me -

about computer essay We write papers to make our customers pleased. Choose from a wide range of academic writing tasks and Nursing research introduction proposal get the one you need. Free sample essay on Help xavier university, Computer Technology: Since the beginning of time technology has helped us out as a human race. From the invention of the proposal, wheel to writing service, the Internet, technology has been a great factor on the way our civilization has grown. With more and more technological advances just around the corner, our civilization will continue to grow faster and faster than ever before. Introduction? Computers make life easier for people everyday. They help us to do tasks quicker and communicate with friends and family with the click on a button. Computers play a significant role in review, the school system as well. They help students to Nursing paper proposal, learn more efficiently and service help them do their work. Computers offer the Internet which helps students research information for projects they may have.

School computers also offer programs which can help anyone learn. An example of research proposal, this is the program All The Right Type. This program helps students as well as teachers, to learn how to type faster and more efficiently. Also there are other programs which younger students can go on Biology writing, to help them with developing and reinforcing their math skills and reading skills. Programs like Math Circus and matching the word with the picture.

Programs like these make it easy to understand and use computers, yet it also makes learning fun. Computers also make writing and research paper introduction doing homework easier to complete. With spell check and other spelling tools, it makes it easier and phd proposal xavier faster to complete work. This is because you are not spending all your time going through your homework looking for research paper spelling mistakes, because the computer automatically does it for xavier university you, making your life easier. Paper Introduction Proposal? Further, Computers also benefit the development of fundamental skills. Good educational software enables children to practice and services develop a broad range skills.

It can help them learn, for example, about research paper, shapes, letters, numbers, rhythm, and colors. Good educational software can also help children develop their understanding of Dissertation service, cause and paper effect, procedural thinking, higher order problem solving and creative expression. Essay? (www.indianchild.com) Many students have become to reliable on computers however. Many children come to libraries to Nursing research introduction, access the writing a paper, computers and CD-ROM#8217;s rather than to read. Though such computer activities are purported to be educational, there is a fundamental difference between the Nursing research paper introduction proposal, skills used in reading versus those used to engage in an interactive CD-ROM. Uf Admission Essay Building? Librarians as well as teachers, should guide as many children as possible towards the text books rather than the computer.

Emotional skills are also enhanced by research paper using a computer. Children develop self-confidence and self-esteem as they master computer skills and use the computer to make things happen. Computers also develop social skills. In a classroom setting with many other students, or in a home when the students friends or parents are available, children often prefer working with one or two partners over working alone, which leads to the development of social skills. Lastly, computers benefit children with special needs in the school system. Computers have proven extremely beneficial to students with certain speech, audio, and motor limitations. Students with special needs can use alternative input and output devices to Uf admission essay, interact with computers and Nursing research paper introduction do things that they normally could not accomplish independently. What they can do through using a computer boosts their self-esteem and provides them with a greater sense of control with the questions, world around them and their own individual lives. The Internet or the information highway #8212; provides them with the best of knowledge for their treatments and they can keep in touch with doctors or friends through out the world with the Internet. (www.indianchild.com) Computer technology will continue to assist special needs students far into Nursing research paper introduction proposal, the future. Essay? In conclusion, technology only benefits those who can afford it, and not those who can#8217;t.

What are poor people or third world countries supposed to do when it comes to proposal, technological advances and they have no money? Does it really seem fair that poor people or third world countries get left behind, while other countries move forward in the technology world? You can order a custom essay, term paper, research paper, thesis or dissertation on Computer Technology at our professional custom essay writing service which provides students with custom papers written by highly qualified academic writers. High quality and no plagiarism guarantee! Get professional essay writing help at an affordable cost. Order a custom written paper of high quality. -ee Charged with Killing Chicago Cop, Former Cha Officer, The Devil in College services don ts, the White City by Nursing paper Larson, Larson describes Chicago by writing about the streets angling past gambling houses, bordellos, and bars, where vice thrived together with the writing, indulgence of the officials.

Advantages of paper introduction, our custom writing services. 100% Money Back Guarantee Prices starting at just $10/page ; Overnight delivery option; Experienced and Help with phd proposal xavier university capable writers; Own plagiarism detection system; Free revisions according to our Revision Policy; We do not drop HARD or BIG assignments; Flexible pricing and research paper great discounts; Pay in several installments and receive your paper in parts; ENL (US, GB, AU, CA) writers available. The authenticity of our custom essay writing and Challenges when confidentiality of Nursing research, all information are guaranteed. We do not reuse ANY custom papers and we do not disclose customers' private information. Writing a Group Project on Network Security September 6, 2017 20 Network Security Project Topics September 6, 2017 10 Facts for a Group Project on Network Security September 6, 2017. Essay: Tips for Buying a Car in University. October 22, 2015.

Essay: Public Universities vs Private Universities. Who Wins? October 20, 2015. Narrative Essay on a Memorable Incident. Order a custom written report of high quality. 96% of orders delivered on Uf admission essay, time.

8.5 out of 10 average quality score. You are allowed to use the original model paper you will receive in the following ways: As a source for additional understanding of the Nursing research proposal, subject As a source of ideas / reasoning for your own research (if properly referenced) For proper paraphrasing (see your educational institution's definition of Uf admission, plagiarism and acceptable paraphrase) Direct citing (if referenced properly) Thank you very much for your respect to our authors' copyrights. We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on research paper proposal, our website. Voucher? By continuing to browse this site, you give consent for cookies to be used.

For more details, including how you can amend your preferences, please read our Cookie Policy. Disclaimer: One Freelance Limited - custom writing service that provides online custom written papers, such as term papers, research papers, thesis papers, essays, dissertations and other custom writing services inclusive of research material, for assistance purposes only. These custom papers should be used with proper reference.

Jan 27, 2018 Nursing research paper introduction proposal, buy essay online help and buy professionals essays -

causes ww2 essay We can count many causes of World War 2, political and others, but the three root causes of World War 2 were : The Prussian Militarism - developed in 200 years of history, it was the force that made Germany so powerful, and made it possible for a man like Adolf Hitler to gain total control of it. Paper Proposal! Adolf Hitler - a madman and political genius, Adolf Hitler re-ignited the Prussian militarism after the German defeat in World War 1, and with this great power under his total control, he started the greatest and cruelest war in writing, history, in his planned attempt to vastly expand Germany and to dominate the Nursing research paper proposal entire world. Appeasement - Britain and Dissertation review service France could easily stop Hitler when Germany was still weak, but their war-traumatized pacifist desire to totally avoid violence just helped Hitler rebuild Germany's military strength more rapidly, until it was too late to stop him. For many centuries, the paper introduction proposal territory of Challenges when a paper justification modern Germany was divided between over 300 German-speaking small and independent political units ruled by small absolute princes. Research Paper Introduction! Prussia, in Love essay, eastern Germany, with Berlin its capital city, was one of these many countries. The Prussian militarism started with Friedrich Wilhelm I, The soldier king of Prussia (1713-1740), then a small kingdom around Berlin, and developed for over 200 years, making Prussia one of the most militarist countries in history, A military that has a state. Prussia was an efficient and strictly disciplined military-oriented state, with a militarist mentality and the world's most effective army.

Prussia was initially just a small agricultural state with little resources, but The soldier king and introduction his successors, with an impressive combination of Help xavier merciless iron will and Nursing introduction proposal organizational talent, converted it to Dissertation review service, a modern Sparta. Prussia typically spent 65% - 85% of its budget on its military, an enormous spending. Such a system could be sustained for so long only by a combination of : Strict, efficient, professional, and Nursing research blindly obedient civil service that ran the Dissertation review delivery state for its king, and for his strict, efficient, professional, and blindly obedient army. The backbone of Prussia's civil and Nursing research paper military services were the Junkers, (the word means young lords in old German), the conservative and militarist aristocratic land owners, who were Prussia's officer Corps and held almost all the senior and medium-level civil positions. An education system which produced hard working obedient people, aware of their duty and willing to Uf admission, sacrifice. Expansion. Prussia's formidable military strength, and its willingness to use it, enabled its rapid territorial expansion by a skilled combination of military victories and power diplomacy. The territorial expansion added population and resources, which fed and Nursing research proposal sustained the Prussian military. In the 19th century, with the industrial age, Prussia's military advantage increased even further. Prussia's successful expansionist militarism reached its peak under the leadership of Otto von Bismarck, The Iron Chancellor, who was its prime minister for 28 years (1862-1890). A great statesman and diplomat, Bismarck's political vision was to unify the many German states to one great country, a German Empire in Prussian domination, by a combined campaign of Blood and review delivery iron and diplomacy.

Bismarck achieved that goal in less than a decade, with a series of wars and diplomatic maneuvers, and dedicated the research proposal rest of Biology service his long tenure to solidify his great achievement, both by helping to keep Europe in peace, and by keeping Prussia and its Junkers class in power in their new Empire, while skillfully capping calls for democracy. Bismarck knew how to preserve his great achievement, but his successors did not. In 1914 the peace in Europe collapsed into World War 1. After four years of terrible and futile carnage in both sides, the introduction combined weight of several great powers finally overcame the College German military. The German High Command in 1918 did not wait for the collapse, and stopped the war when they realized that they're about to lose, saving the country from Nursing research paper proposal, further destruction. As a result of the defeat, monarchy was abolished, the large German military was dismantled, later re-established under very severe limitations of its size and equipment, the exhausted country was required to pay unbearably enormous compensations to the equally exhausted victors, and democracy was established, in the country of people who were taught to essay questions, strictly obey their superiors, not elect them (there were elections in Germany earlier, but the Nursing research paper introduction proposal Reichstag (Congress) had no real authority). On the surface, the new German republic seemed a different country, a peaceful and disarmed democracy that was no longer a threat to its neighbors, and Biology voucher became a prolific and Nursing research paper introduction influential center of with xavier modern arts and science. But under the Nursing research proposal surface, it was still the Prussian Germany, with the writing service Junkers in power in the civil and military service (including the admired wartime supreme commander as president), with a limited military force, but one that was formed from the proposal finest war veterans and Love questions demonstrated great resourcefulness in bypassing the Nursing research proposal limits dictated by the peace treaty, and with phd proposal university the country was in a financial crisis and a political chaos, and many Germans blamed the peace treaty's dictations of their country's troubles, and research introduction wanted to restore its national pride and College services do and past greatness, which above all meant a desire to restore Germany's military strength. With all the power of great, long-term, political, social, economical and cultural forces that shape human history, historians are awed by the great role of key individuals, the ability of the right person at Nursing paper proposal the right time and place to deeply affect the Dissertation review delivery direction of research history.

When World War 1 ended in Love, a German defeat and the large German military was dismantled, most Germans accepted the new reality and did their best to build their new post-war civilian life, in difficult economic circumstances. Nursing Research Introduction Proposal! For Adolf Hitler, who was a plain soldier in the war (severely wounded twice, decorated twice for bravery in battle), the prospects of new life and career were even less promising. A high-school dropout who was a poor homeless nomad in Vienna before the war, Hitler was not even a German citizen, he was an Austrian who volunteered to the German military when World War 1 started. Uf Admission Building! He had no family or friends in Germany, no contact with his family in Austria, and a [theoretical] attempt to evaluate his social skills by research paper proposal, his relations with his fellow soldiers during the writing war, or with women, before and after the research proposal war, would also suggest a very unpromising future, since Hitler was unpopular in his unit, the other soldiers thought he was weird, and essay he was very inhibited with regard to women. From such an unpromising start point, the chance that such a person can rise from so low to becoming an extremely popular and Nursing research paper successful political leader, seemed practically impossible, but Hitler did that in just 13 years. In 1920 he resigned from the College essay do and army (he was still technically a soldier) to research paper proposal, enter politics as the essay services do and don ts leader of a very tiny unknown extreme right political group, not even a party yet, and in 1933 he was elected the Chancellor of Germany, and quickly abolished democracy, as he said he would, and became a dictator of absolute power. For Hitler's full biography, read my Adolf Hitler essay. Here I'll describe the unique set of qualities of Hitler's personality, and then explain why without them Hitler, or anyone else, could not lead Germany so fast to a second war, a World War that shook the world and almost drowned it in blood.

In his authoritative book The Rise and research Fall of the Third Reich : A History of Nazi Germany, William L. Shirer writes about Hitler : The man who founded the Third Reich, who ruled it ruthlessly and often with uncommon shrewdness, who led it to writing a paper justification, such dizzy heights and to research paper introduction, such sorry end, was a person of undoubted, if evil, genius. It is true that he found in the German people, as centuries of don ts experience had molded them up to that time, a natural instrument which he was able to shape to his own sinister ends. But without Adolf Hitler, who was possessed of a demonic personality, a granite will, uncanny instincts, a cold ruthlessness, a remarkable intellect, a soaring imagination and, until toward the end, an amazing capacity to size up people and situations, there almost certainly would never have been a Third Reich. It is Nursing research introduction, one of the great examples of the singular and incalculable power of personality in historical life. To some Germans and, no doubt, to most foreigners it appeared that a charlatan had come to power in Berlin. To the majority of Germans Hitler had, or would shortly assume, the aura of a truly charismatic leader. They were to follow him blindly, as if he possessed a divine judgment, for service voucher the next twelve tempestuous years. Hitler was an research introduction proposal exceptional speaker, a demagogue. His speeches might now seem weird or funny, and that's what foreigners thought of him until it was too late, but the effect of Hitler's speeches on service, his political audience was almost hypnotic. Nursing Paper Introduction Proposal! First of all, that's what gave him the leadership of the tiny group that he joined, as the other few members, and others who joined later, quickly realized that their only hope of Help xavier university ever getting anywhere in politics depends on Hitler's gift of speech.

Then, as party leader, Hitler was different from all his political opponents in Nursing research introduction, his vision for Germany's future. Hitler had an exceptionally far-fetched and very appealing vision of what he wanted for Germany, how to get there, and why it will succeed. Hitler didn't just promise a better future like politicians do. He promised them the world. Help Phd Proposal Xavier! He convinced them that it's theirs by Nursing introduction, natural right and that they have the power to take it for themselves, that they are a Masters race of superior people, and he was so convincing that they believed him. By that, Hitler dwarfed all his political opponents, and slowly, year by year, but at an increasing rate, more Germans listened to his message and became supporters. Hitler's words were also backed by brutal street violence. German politics in those years was not just speeches, and Hitler operated, ruthlessly, a private army of 500,000 street gangsters, the review service S.A organization, or Brown shirts as they were called for their uniform, who attacked other parties followers and gatherings. In the effectiveness of their organized brutality, the Nazis also left all their political opponents behind.

Those in power, the leaders of mainstream parties and the widely respected president, saw the danger in Hitler and disliked him, but they kept underestimating him until it was too late, and after the 1933 elections, he overcame all of them in a political negotiation in which they did not realize what he was trying to Nursing research proposal, achieve and why, and so he got what he needed while his political opponents thought that the deal they made with him will keep him under control. So in 1933 Hitler did the Help with phd proposal unbelievable and became the prime minister of Germany, and his partner Goering became minister of the Police. The Nazi party was a minority in a coalition government, but Hitler and Goering immediately used the emergency authorities of their new roles, combined with massive street violence that totally ignored the law. But since by then the research paper Nazis were the Challenges when writing a paper justification police, the law meant nothing. Hitler was the research law in Germany between January 1933 and his death in Dissertation review service delivery, 1945. But once he got to power and became a dictator, Hitler faced a new threat, a threat that persisted until 1938. Paper Introduction Proposal! The German military quickly learned of Hitler's plans for Dissertation delivery a new war.

Feeling responsible for Nursing research paper saving Germany from disaster, since it was still so weak militarily, groups of senior officers seriously planned to remove Hitler in a military coup, but Hitler, who needed the Generals for Help phd proposal xavier university his intended war but did not trust their enthusiasm of him and his plans, always outsmarted them, sometimes very narrowly, until when the war started, the series of German victories made the Generals put these plans aside. The Generals returned to attempting to remove Hitler when he was losing the war, and in 1944 he survived an assassination attempt by the military by Nursing research introduction, pure luck, when a bomb exploded next to him in a room where he held a meeting. But even after overcoming his domestic opposition, Hitler still had to face the world outside, the when writing a paper far stronger and increasingly worried European powers, Britain, France, Russia, and Germany's smaller neighbors which were protected by alliances and shared strategic interests with those powers, above all the interest to avoid having a militarist and mighty Germany next door again. In the area of international power politics Hitler had his greatest success. He was a statesman the research introduction proposal world had not seen before, an exceptional poker player who played an essay services incredibly dangerous game and won time after time, a series of amazing victories which time after time convinced the worried Generals to Nursing proposal, delay their plans to remove him, and further increased his already high popularity at home, making him, for a few years, the most genuinely popular dictator in history, which is why the review service Germans kept following him later, like a losing but still hopeful gambler, all the way down to disaster.

What Bismarck achieved in a decade of diplomacy combined with a series of wars, Hitler achieved in lightning fast diplomatic moves combined, until September 1939, with military threats but not actual warfare. Europe's other leaders were always at least a step behind him, with political maneuvers and turns that ended in Nursing research paper, days or sometimes overnight, literally. It was unprecedented in diplomatic history, and Hitler managed, with incredible skill and astonishing success, using all the characteristics of his unique personality described above, to arrange and initiate a series of crises on the brink of war, and come out the Help phd proposal university winner with great gains, territorial and other, time and again, and without actually starting a war, a war which until 1939 he was going to lose because the research German military was still too small and Help phd proposal xavier ill-equipped to win. The German Generals knew it well and were rightfully worried, the European leaders knew it, and Hitler knew it, and still, time after time, between 1935 and 1939, he won with weaker cards, thanks to research paper introduction proposal, his exceptional personal abilities in a fast paced diplomatic game of threats and negotiations, of alternating between reason and fury, of deception, temptation, intimidation, lies, stress. Just like his former domestic political opponents, most of whom were dead or imprisoned by then, Europe's political leaders also underestimated and misjudged Hitler, and many of them also ended up dead or imprisoned by him, sometimes not much later after meeting him as peers. But having to deal with a talented diplomatic opponent like Adolf Hitler can not be accepted as an excuse for the political leaderships of France and College essay don ts Great Britain, which could easily put an end to Hitler's dangerous game before 1939, when he still lacked the military power to paper introduction, survive active resistance to his actions, a resistance that was likely to quickly knock him down, either by military defeat or by a military coup. The appeasement of Hitler, by Britain and France mostly, was not just the result of the incompetence and Love essay pacifism of particular top politicians like Neville Chamberlain in Britain, and Edouard Daladier, Paul Reynaud, Georges Bonnet in introduction, France. These elected leaders represented the nationwide pacifism of their war-traumatized nations, which resulted from the enormous and futile carnage in the battlefields of review delivery World War I, that ended in 1918 and research paper was therefore still firmly in the memories and thoughts of all adults. The blindness that led to the continued and repeated appeasement of Hitler in crisis after crisis, all of which he initiated, was the result of two logical flaws in Biology service, the thinking and decision making of the Nursing paper introduction British and French political leaders, and also, which is even worse, in the thinking of the top Generals, mostly of the justification French military. Since these were logical flaws, they are inexcusable, as political and Nursing research paper introduction military leaders have the responsibility to essay, make decisions based on paper proposal, reality, even if unpleasant one, not on single-sided desires and wishes. Furthermore, they were repeatedly warned, by Winston Churchill and Uf admission building others, and even by high ranking members of the anti-Nazi opposition in the German military and foreign office, but all warnings were dismissed until it was too late.

The two logical flaws in the British and French national thought were: The wide belief, based on introduction proposal, the first World War, that war has become futile, a fruitless mutual mass carnage. This belief was false because it relied on two false assumptions: The assumption that the opposing forces in writing, a future war will be generally equivalent as in the first World War. The assumption that modern military technology made war between equivalent enemies a futile carnage. Based on these two unchallenged false assumptions, Britain and France greatly reduced their military manpower and largely neglected military modernization and military technology development, and persisted with that policy even when they knew that Hitler's Germany, like 18th century Prussia, was making a maximum national effort to Nursing paper proposal, build the when writing a paper justification strongest and Nursing research paper proposal most technologically advanced military force, in a total violation of the 1919 peace treaty. By that, these nations' military forces were gradually reduced from with phd proposal xavier university, a decisive superiority over the small post-war German military, to research, an increasing inferiority, technological, tactical, and professional. Britain and France made these assumptions false by their own unilateral action and essay services do and in-action that was based on these assumptions. The British military establishment was finally alarmed in Nursing paper introduction, 1938 and hurried to start closing the gap as they could in the months left before war finally started in 1939. The French military remained stuck in the obsolete past, unable to when writing a paper, believe that war will return so soon, and largely unprepared for it, technologically, tactically, and professionally. Nursing Research Proposal! The few warning voices within the French military, like that of Dissertation service Colonel Charles De Gaulle, were suppressed and dismissed until it was too late.

The belief that Hitler can be appeased, that he will stop demanding more, that he too wants to avoid war, and therefore that war against Nursing research introduction, Hitler's Germany can be avoided. The British and French leaders and writing their military, diplomatic, and intelligence advisors should all have known or at paper least suspect that this was not so, and act accordingly. Hitler made no secret of his long term plans and Help with xavier intentions. He clearly warned the world of his intentions, both in Nursing proposal, the book he wrote in Uf admission, 1923, which sold many millions of copies since he became the leader of Germany, and in research introduction proposal, his many speeches and direct diplomatic threats in all the years since. Furthermore, they knew from experience that after every crisis he initiated and won, Hitler started another crisis with new demands. But all that was ignored and Europe's leaders and diplomats were willing to accept Hitler's deception which time and again claimed that he was making one last justified demand and even willing to make reasonable concessions about it. A total lie, time and again. The British government finally opened its eyes to the frightening reality in essay questions, march 1939, when less than six months after Hitler was given part of its ally Czechoslovakia, Hitler swallowed the rest of Nursing research paper introduction proposal Czechoslovakia with a threat of immediate invasion to it, and just three days later clearly marked his next target, Poland.

The worried British government then decided to stand beside its ally Poland even if that means war. The French government still tried to avoid war even after the war started with Hitler's invasion to their ally Poland, and after the last minute ultimatum to Hitler to stop the invasion was ignored, and unwillingly joined the war only following a British diplomatic pressure to stop hesitating and stand beside it. The result of the appeasement policy was that Britain and essay questions France did nothing more than diplomatically protest when Hitler violated the peace treaty (and later with treaties that he signed), started a major rearmament plan, largely increased military manpower, sent his army to the neutral Saar border region (with clear orders to retreat immediately in case of Nursing proposal French military response, but this never came), sent his army to the demilitarized Rhine border region, annexed Austria by combination of political murders and threat of invasion. When Hitler demanded the strategically important western region of Czechoslovakia, they put unbearable pressure on the Czech government, their ally, to immediately give this territory to Hitler to avoid war that Hitler threatened to start, and review still did not act when Hitler swallowed the rest of Nursing research paper introduction proposal Czechoslovakia with a threat of service immediate invasion. They also did nothing meaningful when Italy, Hitler's ally dictatorship, invaded Ethiopia and Nursing research paper proposal later invaded its European neighbor Albania.

With every step of expansion, Hitler gained not just more territory and population. He also got the natural resources in these territories, the industry, and the equipment of the Challenges when a paper dismantled armies of the nations he swallowed, and the military strength of these nations was removed from the potential order of battle of his future enemies. Czechoslovakia is a key example. It had a significant military force, very well equipped, with a modern supporting domestic military industry, and fortified excellent natural defense lines along the research paper introduction German-Czech border in western Czechoslovakia. The Czechs wanted to fight for their country and could fight well with their modern military and excellent defenses, and definitely with military help from France and Britain, their allies, but they were betrayed by France and Britain which played Hitler's game and threatened the Czechs that by not surrendering these regions to Hitler as he demanded, they, the Help with phd proposal xavier Czechs, risk being blamed for Nursing paper starting a war. Under enormous pressure by both allies and Dissertation review enemies, the Czechs gave that land and all the military equipment in it to research paper introduction proposal, Hitler and College essay remained almost defenseless, only to be forced to complete their surrender to his next threat of Nursing introduction proposal immediate invasion just months later. In addition to the valuable territorial and industrial gain, and to removing a significant military force from his list of paper writing voucher enemies without firing a shot, Hitler also gained the entire equipment of the dismantled Czech military.

This modern equipment, in plenty, was used by the German military in World War 2, and in the invasion of France, two German armor divisions were using solely Czech tanks, and the Czech military industry was producing plenty more for Hitler's army. One can not write about the causes of World War 2 without referring to the Japanese militarism, that was very similar to the German militarism, and which put Japan in the hands of militarist leaders with expansionist aggression similar to Hitler's. Nursing Introduction Proposal! After all, Japan started the war in Love essay, East Asia even before Hitler became dictator of Germany, and its militarism was defeated only after Hitler's. It is paper introduction proposal, my opinion that if the Help with phd proposal xavier university attention and military resources of all the world's other major military powers were not committed to research paper introduction, the European war against Hitler's Germany, Japan would have kept its military aggression limited to its never ending war in China, which between and 1931 and 1945 consumed the majority of the resources and attention of the Japanese army and remained Japan's original and main goal. If the USA, Britain, France, Russia were not so busy with Hitler, it is likely that Japan would not have expanded its Chinese war to a rapid and Help with phd proposal university easy conquest of the European colonies in the entire South East Asia, and would not attack the Nursing US in the Phillipines and Pearl Harbor, and that even if it had, its success would have been significantly smaller and shorter.

Jan 27, 2018 Nursing research paper introduction proposal, write my paper for me -

Linux Driver Tutorial: How to Write a Simple Linux Device Driver. This Linux device driver tutorial will provide you with all the necessary information about how to write a device driver for Linux operating systems. This article includes a practical Linux driver development example that’s easy to follow. Paper Introduction Proposal? We’ll discuss the following: Kernel logging system How to work with character devices How to work with user-level memory from the kernel. We’ll use Linux kernel version 2.6.32.

We could use newer versions, but their APIs may have been modified, and thus can be different from the API used in our examples and build system. After studying this tutorial, you’ll be acquainted with the process of Dissertation service delivery writing a device driver, or a kernel module, for a Linux operating system. 2. Loading and unloading modules. 3. Registering character device. 4. Nursing Research Paper Introduction Proposal? Using memory allocated in user mode. 5. Build system of a kernel module. 6. Loading and Dissertation delivery, using a module. Linux has a monolithic kernel. For this reason, writing a device driver for Linux requires performing a combined compilation with the kernel. Another way around is to implement your driver as a kernel module, in which case you won’t need to recompile the kernel to add another driver.

We’ll be concerned with this second option: kernel modules. At its base, a module is a specifically designed object file. When working with modules, Linux links them to its kernel by Nursing introduction proposal, loading them to Biology paper writing service voucher, its address space. The Linux kernel was developed using the C programming language and Assembler. C implements the Nursing research proposal main part of the kernel, and Assembler implements parts that depend on the architecture. Unfortunately, these are the only two languages we can use for device driver programming in Linux. We cannot use C++, which is Uf admission essay, used for the Microsoft Windows operating system kernel, because some parts of the Linux kernel source code – header files, to be specific – may include keywords from C++ (for example, delete or new ), while in Assembler we may encounter lexemes such as ‘ : : ’ . We run the module code in the kernel context. This requires a developer to be very attentive, as it entails extra responsibilities: if a developer makes a mistake when implementing a user-level application, this will not cause problems outside the user application in most cases; but if a developer makes a mistake when implementing a kernel module, the consequences will be problems at the system level. Luckily for us, the Nursing research Linux kernel has a nice feature of being resistant to errors in module code.

When the kernel encounters non-critical errors (for example, null pointer dereferencing), you’ll see the oops message (insignificant malfunctions during Linux operation are called oops ), after which the Challenges when writing justification malfunctioning module will be unloaded, allowing the kernel and other modules to Nursing research paper introduction, work as usual. Essay? In addition, you’ll be able to find a record in the kernel log that precisely describes this error. But be aware that continuing work after an oops message is not recommended, as doing so may lead to instability and kernel panic. The kernel and paper introduction proposal, its modules essentially represent a single program module – so keep in mind that a single program module uses a single global namespace. In order to minimize it, you must watch what is being exported by the module: exported global characters must be named uniquely (a commonly used workaround is to simply use the name of the module that’s exporting the characters as a prefix) and must be cut to the bare minimum. To create a simple sample module, we don’t need to do much work.

Here’s some code that demonstrates this: The only two things this module does is essay services do and don ts, load and Nursing introduction proposal, unload itself. To load a Linux driver, we call the College do and my_init function, and to Nursing research, unload it, we call the my_exit function. The module_init and module_exit macros notify the kernel about driver loading and unloading. The my_init and my_exit functions must have identical signatures, which must be exactly as follows: If the module requires a certain kernel version and must include information on the version, we need to essay, link the linux/module.h header file. Paper Proposal? Trying to College do and don ts, load a module built for another kernel version will lead to the Linux operating system prohibiting its loading. There’s a reason for research, such behavior: updates to the kernel API are released quite often, and when you call a module function whose signature has been changed, you cause damage to the whole stack. The module_init and College essay, module_exit macros are declared in the linux/init.h header file. The example module above is paper introduction, very simple; now we’re going to work with something more complex.

Nevertheless, one of the purposes of this short Linux kernel driver tutorial is to when justification, show how to proposal, work with logging into the kernel and how to when a paper justification, interact with device files. These tools may be simple, but they come in handy for any driver, and to some extent, they make the kernel-mode development process richer. For a start, here’s some useful information about device files. Research Paper Introduction Proposal? Commonly, you can find device files in the /dev folder. They facilitate interaction between the Biology paper service user and the kernel code. If the kernel must receive anything, you can just write it to a device file to pass it to the module serving this file; anything that’s read from a device file originates from the Nursing introduction proposal module serving this file. We can divide device files into Help with xavier, two groups: character files and Nursing proposal, block files. Uf Admission Essay? Character files are non-buffered, whereas block files are buffered.

As their names imply, character files allow you to read and write data character by character, while block files allow you to write only whole blocks of data. We’ll leave the discussion of block files out of the scope of this article, and will get straight to character files. Linux systems have a way of identifying device files via major device numbers , which identify modules serving device files or a group of devices, and minor device numbers , which identify a specific device among a group of devices that a major device number specifies. In the driver code, we can define these numbers as constants or they can be allocated dynamically. Research Paper Proposal? In case a number defined as a constant has already been used, the system will return an error. When a number is College services do and don ts, allocated dynamically, the Nursing paper introduction function reserves that number to prohibit it from being used by Uf admission essay, anything else. The function cited below is used for registering character devices: Here, we specify the name and Nursing proposal, major number of Challenges a paper justification a device to register it, after which the device and the file_operations structure will be linked. If we assign zero to the major parameter, the function will allocate a major device number (i.e. the value it returns) on Nursing proposal, its own. Uf Admission Building? If the value returned is zero, this signifies success, while a negative number signifies an error.

Both device numbers are specified in the 0–255 range. We pass the device name as a string value of the name parameter (this string can also pass the name of a module if it registers a single device). We then use this string to identify a device in paper introduction, the /sys/devices file. Device file operations such as read, write, and Dissertation delivery, save are processed by the function pointers stored within the file_operations structure. These functions are implemented by the module and the pointers to research paper introduction, the module structure identifying this module are also stored within the file_operations structure. Here you can see the 2.6.32 kernel version structure: If the file_operations structure contains some functions that aren’t required, you can still use the phd proposal university file without implementing them. A pointer to an unimplemented function can simply be set to be zero. After that, the system will take care of the implementation of the function and make it behave normally.

In our case, we'll just implement the Nursing read function. As we're going to ensure the operation of only a single type of device with our Linux driver, our file_operations structure will be global and Dissertation review service, static. Correspondingly, after it's created, we'll need to fill it statically. Here you can see how this is done: The declaration of the THIS_MODULE macro is contained in the linux/module.h header file. We transform the Nursing research paper introduction proposal macro into the pointer to the module structure of the required module. Biology Writing? A bit later, we'll get to writing the Nursing paper body of the function with a prototype, but right now we have only the pointer to it, which is device_file_read . The file_operations structure allows us to write several functions that will perform and Love essay questions, revoke the registration of the device file. The device_file_major _number is a global variable that contains the major device number. When the lifetime of the driver expires, this global variable will revoke the registration of the device file.

We've already listed and mentioned almost all functions, and the last one is the paper introduction printk function. The declaration of this function is Uf admission essay building, contained in the linux/kernel.h file, and its task is simple: to log kernel messages. You’ve no doubt paid attention to Nursing paper introduction proposal, the KERN_NOTICE and KERN_WARNING prefixes, which are present in when writing, all listed format strings of printk. As you might have guessed, NOTICE and WARNING signify the priority level of a message. Levels range from the introduction most insignificant KERN_DEBUG to the critical KERN_EMERG , alerting about kernel instability. Dissertation Review Service Delivery? This is the only difference between the research paper introduction printk function and the printf library function. The printk function forms a string, which we write to the circular buffer, where the klog daemon reads it and Challenges writing, sends it to the system log. The implementation of the printk function allows it to be called from anywhere in the kernel. Nursing Research? The worst case scenario is the overflow of the circular buffer, meaning that the Challenges writing oldest message is not recorded in the log. The next step is writing a function for reverting the registration of the device file. If a device file is successfully registered, the research paper value of the device_file_major_number will not be zero.

This allows us to do and don ts, revoke the registration of the file using the nregister_chrdev function , which we declare in the linux/fs.h file. Research Proposal? The major device number is the first parameter of this function, followed by a string containing the paper voucher device name. The register_chrdev and the unresister_chrdev functions act in analogous ways. To register a device, we use the following code: 4. Using Memory Allocated in User Mode. The function we're going to research paper proposal, write will read characters from a device. The signature of this function must be appropriate for that from the file_operations structure:

Let’s have a look at Challenges writing justification the first parameter, the pointer to the file structure. This file structure allows us to get necessary information about the file with which we're working, details on private data related to this current file, and so on. The data that has been read is allocated to the user space using the second parameter, which is a buffer. The number of bytes for reading is defined in the third parameter, and we start reading the Nursing paper proposal bytes from a certain offset defined in the fourth parameter. After executing the function, the number of bytes that have been successfully read must be returned, after which the offset must be refreshed. The user allocates a special buffer in Biology paper writing voucher, the user-mode address space.

And the other action that the read function must perform is to copy the information to research paper introduction proposal, this buffer. The address to which a pointer from that space points and the address in the kernel address space may have different values. That's why we cannot simply dereference the pointer. Review Delivery? When working with these pointers, we have a set of research introduction proposal specific macros and functions that we declare in the asm/uaccess.h file. The most suitable function in our case is copy_to_user() . Its name speaks for itself: it simply copies specific data from the kernel buffer to the buffer allocated in the user space. In addition, it also verifies if a pointer is valid and if the buffer size is Help with xavier, large enough.

Thus, errors in the driver can be processed relatively easily. Here's the Nursing paper introduction code for the copy_to_user prototype: First of with xavier university all, this function must receive three pointers as parameters: a pointer to the buffer, a pointer to the data source, and a pointer to the number of Nursing paper proposal bytes for copying. Xavier? As we've mentioned, an error returns a value other than zero, and in the case of successful execution, the value will be zero. The function contains the _user macro, whose task is to perform documenting process. It has another useful application that allows us to analyze if the code uses pointers from the address space correctly; this is Nursing, done using the sparse analyzer, which performs analysis of static code. Make sure to paper writing service, always mark user address space pointers as _user . This tutorial contains only an research paper introduction example of Uf admission essay building a Linux device driver without an actual device. Nursing Research Paper Introduction? If you don't need anything other than strings of text to College essay, be returned after reading a device file, then this will be enough. Here's the code for implementing the read function: 5. Build System of a Kernel Module. After we've written the code for the driver, it's time to research introduction, build it and see if it works as we expect.

In the earlier kernel versions (such as 2.4), building a module required many more movements from a developer: the environment for Uf admission building, compilation needed to paper introduction, be prepared individually and the compilation itself required the GCC compiler. Only after that would a developer receive an *.o file - a module that could be loaded to the kernel. Fortunately, these times are long gone and the process is much simpler now. Today, much of the work is done by the makefile: it starts the kernel build system and provides the kernel with the information about the components required to build the module. Essay Questions? A module built from a single source file requires a single string in the makefile. After creating this file, you need only to initiate the kernel build system: As you can see, here we've assigned the source file name to the module, which will be a *.ko file. Correspondingly, if there are several source files, only two strings are required: The make command initializes the kernel build system: To build the Nursing paper proposal module: To clean up the build folder:

The module build system is commonly located in /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build. College Don Ts? Now it's time to prepare the module build system. To build the first module, execute the research paper proposal following command from the folder where the Dissertation review service build system is located: Finally, we combine everything we've learned into one makefile: The load target loads the build module and the unload target deletes it from the kernel. In our tutorial, we've used code from main.c and device_file.c to compile the driver.

The resulting driver is named simple-module.ko. The following command executed from the source file folder allows us to load the built module: After executing this command, the name of the driver is added to the /proc/modules file, while the device that the module registers is added to the /proc/devices file. The added records look like this: The first three records contain the name of the Nursing introduction added device and the major device number with which it's associated.

The minor number range (0–255) allows the device files to be created in the /dev virtual file system. After we've created the device file, we need to College do and don ts, perform the final verification to research paper introduction, make sure that what we've done works as expected. To verify, we can use the cat command to display the contents: 1. Phd Proposal University? Linux Device Drivers, 3rd Edition by Jonathan Corbet, Alessandro Rubini, and Greg Kroah-Hartman: http://lwn.net/Kernel/LDD3/ 2. The Linux Kernel Module Programming Guide by Peter Jay Salzman and Ori Pomeranz: http://tldp.org/LDP/lkmpg/2.6/html/lkmpg.html Linux Cross Reference http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident. We hope this tutorial comes in handy.

You can learn more about Apriorit driver development.